On 10/18/22 11:14, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
On 10/17/22 16:29, Dominik Csapak wrote:
high level looks mostly good, a small question:
is there a special reason why we ignore pre-lvm osds here?
AFAICS, we simply error out for osds that don't live on lvm
(though we can add additional types later i
On 10/17/22 16:29, Dominik Csapak wrote:
high level looks mostly good, a small question:
is there a special reason why we ignore pre-lvm osds here?
AFAICS, we simply error out for osds that don't live on lvm
(though we can add additional types later i guess)
Mainly because with a recent Cep
high level looks mostly good, a small question:
is there a special reason why we ignore pre-lvm osds here?
AFAICS, we simply error out for osds that don't live on lvm
(though we can add additional types later i guess)
comments in the individual patches
_
ping?
patches still apply cleanly
On 7/6/22 15:01, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
This patch series adds 2 new API endpoints for OSDs to fetch more
detailed information about a single OSD. One for overall information and
one for a single volume (block, db, wal).
Because the api endpoint for the volume
This patch series adds 2 new API endpoints for OSDs to fetch more
detailed information about a single OSD. One for overall information and
one for a single volume (block, db, wal).
Because the api endpoint for the volume infos can take a few moments, we
most likely want to show that loading state.
