Hi Alexandre, see:
http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/20165-After-upgrading-from-3-2-to-3-3-old-pve-qemu-kvm-ceph-vm-doesnt-start
but you wrote in the commit:
> No impact if the block driver don't support it yet (like rbd)
So what is wrong?
___
pve-deve
>>id=drive-virtio0,discard=on,aio=native,cache=none,detect-zeroes=unmap
I think this is because virtio-blk don't support discard
if discard=on
detect-zeroes=unmap
else
detect-zeroes=on
I'll retest right now, I'll keep you in touch
- Mail original -
De: "Dietmar Maurer"
À: "Alexandr
Oh,
in the forum post:
#apt-mark hold pve-qemu-kvm
So, user is using an old version of qemu-kvm without detect-zeroes support
- Mail original -
De: "Alexandre DERUMIER"
À: "Dietmar Maurer"
Cc: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Mardi 28 Octobre 2014 11:18:36
Objet: Re: [pve-de
maybe,could we add kvm_user_version() detection before enable this feature ?
(I have checked with discard or not on virtio-blk, it's working fine with last
qemu)
- Mail original -
De: "Alexandre DERUMIER"
À: "Dietmar Maurer"
Cc: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Mardi 28 Octobr
> maybe,could we add kvm_user_version() detection before enable this feature ?
I guess that is not necessary. We always use the newest features, so users need
to update
all packages.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxm
> (I have checked with discard or not on virtio-blk, it's working fine with
> last qemu)
Many thanks for testing! I have answered the forum post now.
- Dietmar
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/
> I was wondering if support for UEFI in VM's could be added to PVE.
>
> See http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/OVMF
>
> It looks to be an alternative firmware image that is loaded instead of the
> usual
> bios.bin
I would like to add EFI support, but those howtos are highly confusing for me.
__
Dear,
I have now the same problem on one host!
When I restart the pve-firewall, in log-File I have this:
pve-firewall[636118]: status update error: command '/usr/sbin/ipset
restore' failed: exit code 1
I have make an ipset list, their is this in:
Name: PVEFW-0-blacklist
Type: hash:net
Header:
Dear,
can been, that the problems comes with to much containers?
I have now mv many *.fw to other folder and behind a restart the
pve-firewall works!
So, now I will step by step move the container settings of *.fw in
/etc/pve/firewall back and we will see later, whats happen!
Regards
Detlef
> I must do every 1 minutes this, why proxmox delete the iptable rules in
> beetween of work:
Please never touch rules inside pvefw generated ipset chains!
I already posted a script to show how it can work.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.p
Dear,
so, when one Container is set to firewalled mode and they has an IPv6,
then the firewall cant work anymore!
pve-firewall stop
pve-firewall start
ipvtables -L
is then empty!
In log-File, I get then the error-message: pve-firewall[598770]: status
update error: command '/usr/sbin/ipset restor
Hi,
I think this is because we try to add the ipv6 address in ipv4 ipset.
BTW, ipv6 is not yet supported by proxmox firewall, so as workaround you can
disable the firewall.
But I think we should add a parsing on ipv6 address to avoid that.
- Mail original -
De: "Detlef Bracker"
À:
And this is the same for containers, they use IPv4 and IPv6!
So when proxmox not handle IPv6, what is in our time absolute bad, then
this must been
min. filtered!
More as 60 % of users in germany, now have an IPv6 internet connection!
Software must been
created for IPv4 and IPv6 ! Or what is that
And this is the same for containers, they use IPv4 and IPv6!
So when proxmox not handle IPv6, what is in our time absolute bad, then
this must been
min. filtered!
More as 60 % of users in germany, now have an IPv6 internet connection!
Software must been
created for IPv4 and IPv6 ! Or what is that
Alexandre what's about your IPv6 and brfilter patches? I think they can get
integrated into pve test?
Greets,
Stefan
Stefan
Excuse my typo sent from my mobile phone.
> Am 28.10.2014 um 18:40 schrieb Detlef Bracker :
>
> And this is the same for containers, they use IPv4 and IPv6!
> So when pr
> I fill only a 2nd iplist! This make all the function, what we need!
> In this 2nd IP-List you can fill many thousend address and the check is very
> fast!
> This works finde to with the pve-firewall, when a container is set to
> firewalled,
> then the 2nd iplist is included! The same too for th
Hi Dietmar,
It is a replacement for the bios. You can load ovmf.fd with the -L option
for QEMU.
You can download binary copies of ovmf.fd from:
http://tianocore.github.io/ovmf/
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Dietmar Maurer
wrote:
> > I was wondering if support for UEFI in VM's could be a
17 matches
Mail list logo
