On 18/03/2013 18:00, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
We've been seeing the same development on the Jython wiki. I guess
they just realized that the Python wiki will likely get them
even more Google juice:
http://wiki.python.org/jython/RecentChanges
Of course, ideas as welcome :-)
I've had success with
So, sent to anyone *except* the right address :-(
Seems unlikely that someone would just randomly post a job ad on their
behalf, and I do hate arbitrary threats...
Nonetheless, I'll take it down as part of this evening's batch and copy
in both the posting party and Amberly.
cheers,
Chris
On 26/05/2012 01:16, Aahz wrote:
From my POV, as long as Python is at least half the job, it's appropriate
for the Python Job Board.
It's more subtle than that for me; 50% Python 50% Java? No thanks.
50% Python, 20% html/xml, 20% css, 10% javascript? Maybe. 50%
python, 30% databases, 20%
On 10/05/2012 13:10, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I'm largely sure that I think the job board should split off into its
own microsite at jobs.python.org. How do we go about making that happen?
I think I'm -1 on making a subsite. I like URL stability, so even if
the content maintenance of the jobs
Hi Chris,
Never tried, but if you get a successful clone I'd be interested in a copy!
cheers,
(another) Chris
On 04/05/2012 11:38, Chris Angelico wrote:
Has anyone used git-svn with the pydotorg repository? I'm having a bit
of trouble cloning the repository (aka checking it out); am hoping I
On 15/01/2012 15:16, Georg Brandl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/2012 03:46 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I'm seeing reports via the PSF twitter account that python.org is down. Is
anyone available to take a look at the problem?
I've rebooted the machine, it was
On 08/11/2011 19:14, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 13:09, anatoly techtoniktechto...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.isup.me/pypi.python.org
Works for me, and that page agrees: It's just you.
http://pypi.python.org is up.
It was definitely down for a while there :-P
Chris
--
On 02/10/2011 21:58, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Aahz wrote:
What do people think? I'm -0 because I've never heard of this before
(they haven't been posting to c.l.py.announce) and because they're using
2.7.1 more than three months after 2.7.2 was released.
I'm +1 on this. The more options
On 25/07/2011 11:29, Michael Foord wrote:
On 25/07/2011 10:10, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Hi Michael,
Michael Foord wrote:
On 25/07/2011 09:56, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Could one of the list admins please turn the list archive
of the pydotorg-www list into a private one ?
I don't think it's a good
On 25/03/2011 12:54, s...@pobox.com wrote:
Chris, next time you're in there, please just rip them all out.
Done.
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
On 24/10/2010 21:13, Michael Foord wrote:
I don't think the external search links add a lot of value personally
and am happy to see less rather than more... My vote would be not to add.
Agreed.
FWIW, unless they have a very focused python-specific section, I'd
advocate dumping all links to
11 matches
Mail list logo
