On 24/10/2010 21:13, Michael Foord wrote:
I don't think the external search links add a lot of value personally
and am happy to see less rather than more... My vote would be not to add.
Agreed.
FWIW, unless they have a very focused python-specific section, I'd
advocate dumping all links to e
On 24 Oct 2010, at 18:27, Martin Thomas wrote:
> I updated the search engine list in the sidebar removing a site because, as
> it was pointed out, the quality of their results was not great returning
> positions that simply listed Python. If we add this one, should we restore
> the other as
skip> If it looks okay to other people I see no reason to add it.
Make that "... no reason *not* to add it."
Skip
___
pydotorg-www mailing list
pydotorg-www@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
Martin> I updated the search engine list in the sidebar removing a site
Martin> because, as it was pointed out, the quality of their results was
Martin> not great returning positions that simply listed Python. If we
Martin> add this one, should we restore the other as well?
Not ne
I updated the search engine list in the sidebar removing a site because, as it
was pointed out, the quality of their results was not great returning positions
that simply listed Python. If we add this one, should we restore the other as
well?
//M
On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:43 AM, s...@pobox.com wr
Forwarded from webmaster alias. I have no opinion one way or the other
about providing a link. It would be nice if their Python listings
emphasized Python as a primary skill, not just a secondary or "nice to have"
skill.
Skip
--- Begin Message ---
Dear madam and sirs,
we are a Job-Metasearc
