On Mar 27, 2011, at 5:42 PM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:17:34AM -0700, Aahz wrote:
>> IIRC it's a safety measure to prevent breaking the site. (I'm not
>> sufficiently involved in the build process to have an opinion about your
>> suggestion.)
>
> It's actually more of a
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:17:34AM -0700, Aahz wrote:
> IIRC it's a safety measure to prevent breaking the site. (I'm not
> sufficiently involved in the build process to have an opinion about your
> suggestion.)
It's actually more of a security measure: the code for the build
script, which includ
On Mar 27, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> It seems amk has already done that.
>>
>> The link I added does not appear on http://www.python.org/ (even
>> after clearing the browser cache and trying a different browser).
>
> It seems that you *also* have to do a "clean build"; after
>> It seems amk has already done that.
>
> The link I added does not appear on http://www.python.org/ (even
> after clearing the browser cache and trying a different browser).
It seems that you *also* have to do a "clean build"; after I removed
pydotorg.cache, rebuilding was picking up the templa
On Mar 27, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> I take it most of the people working on the site now are pretty busy.
>> I can help out with maintenance beyond the basics of adding news and
>> other content, if that would be of any use.
>>
>> In the mean time, can someone with the right a
> I take it most of the people working on the site now are pretty busy.
> I can help out with maintenance beyond the basics of adding news and
> other content, if that would be of any use.
>
> In the mean time, can someone with the right access do the clean
> build?
It seems amk has already done
On Mar 27, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Aahz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> Would anyone object to me trying to add the template to the
>> dependencies tracked by the build script?
>
> IIRC it's a safety measure to prevent breaking the site. (I'm not
> sufficiently involved in
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Aahz wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>> On Mar 27, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I don't see any instructions in build/README about how to do a
build on the real site after comm
On Mar 27, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Aahz wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>> On Mar 27, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I don't see any instructions in build/README about how to do a
build on the real
On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Aahz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> On Mar 27, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't see any instructions in build/README about how to do a
>>> build on the real site after committing a change. I assume that is
>>> automated
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> I don't see any instructions in build/README about how to do a
>> build on the real site after committing a change. I assume that is
>> automated with an svn commit hook. Is that right? How often do
On Mar 27, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> I don't see any instructions in build/README about how to do a build on the
> real site after committing a change. I assume that is automated with an svn
> commit hook. Is that right? How often does that run?
>
> I made a couple of changes to
I don't see any instructions in build/README about how to do a build on the
real site after committing a change. I assume that is automated with an svn
commit hook. Is that right? How often does that run?
I made a couple of changes to new-build/pydotorg.tmpl today. Does that require
any special
13 matches
Mail list logo
