Re: [pygtk] gtk-1.3 bindings

2000-06-26 Thread Fred L. Drake, Jr.
James Henstridge writes: It provides a non GUI base for objects. I have been wondering about whether to put the base gobject support into a separate module or not, and whether I should keep it separate from the gtk package (when you import gtk, it initialises the GUI). Does this sound

[pygtk] xinput devices 2 questions

2000-06-26 Thread Scott F. Johnston
1) I was having awful problems trying to get x-input extension events to register. Turns out, all the connections and set_event calls must be done prior to calling a widget's show(). Doh! Is this true of all handling? I find I get very different results if I register events before or after a

Re: [pygtk] gtk-1.3 bindings

2000-06-26 Thread Fred L. Drake, Jr.
James Henstridge writes: Well, this is one of those things where we won't know how many useful non gui libraries will use the object model until after the glib/gtk 2.0 release. I have decided to put the GObject wrapper stuff in a separate module just in case. There's certainly no way

Re: [pygtk] gtk-1.3 bindings

2000-06-26 Thread James Henstridge
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: For quite a while, I have been passing function pointers around as CObjects in the modules (eg. gtk._gtk._PyGtk_API in the 0.7.0 release), which means that the different wrapper modules don't need to see each other's symbols.