fore the schema is returned to
the view. Is there another way to approach the problem?
oO
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe f
so the connection
doesn't get created/closed for every request. I also find that the DB
connection is something that should belong to the resources, not the
request. (and you can always get it from the request using request.root.db
oO
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
Is it possible to declare a Mapping Schema with a built-in validator
attached to it?
I'm creating a form has uses Geo coordinates ( lat, lon ) and I'm looking
for the best way to implement these.
Right now, I have the following:
class GeoCoordSchema(colander.MappingSchema):
lat = coland
ation and validation.
I haven't use any of the other ones in the list.
oO
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, s
lly inserting the record in the database.
Is there a way to have a single top-level validation callback? maybe a
validator on the entire schema? unless there is a way to raise an
exception that would allow me to use that part of the code that re-
renders the form with all of the existing user inputs a
guess the pagination code shouldn't really have to know that I'm using
traversal or route matching.
oO
On Mar 18, 3:05 pm, Michael Merickel wrote:
> The query parameter to resource url expects a list of 2-tuples,
> coincidentally the same as what is returned by request.GET.
as a
dictionary that would be compatible with what resource_url() expects
to rebuild the modified url.
Any ideas?
oO
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com.
Any ideas on that? I've re-read my code, and the documentation, but I
didn't see anything obvious. Should I ask pylons-devel instead? I'm
not sure if writing your own AuthenticationPolicy counts as pylons-
discuss or -devel material ;-)
oO
On Mar 4, 11:10 am, oO wrote:
> I
I seem to be having problems implementing a custom Authentication
Policy class. I've created the following class, and the only purpose
is to remember and forget users using the Session, rather than
creating your own cookie as with the AuthTktAuthenticationPolicy
class. I'm using pyramid_beaker as t
('permission_name',
resource, request)
On Mar 3, 2:48 pm, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 14:46 -0800, oO wrote:
> > The conceptual problems that I have is the following:
>
> > Let's say that I have an Admin resource, somewhere in my resource
&
; so I can include
the admin menu item or not?
Ideally I'm looking for some sort of GET_URL_PERMISSION( "/admin",
"view") function that I could call from the template and pass a url
and permission request that would return a boolean.
Disclaimer: I'm using traversa
is there a framework adapter for pyramid in TurboMail yet? or can you
just use the pylons one?
One of the nice things about pyramid_mailer is the fact that you stick
your settings in the ini file, and you have a simple
Mailer.from_settings(settings) call.
oO
On Mar 1, 4:36 pm, Alice Bevan
Is there a way to construct relative urls using the request object?
I'm working within general purpose template functions, so I pretty
much can only rely on the request object, and I would like to create
urls in the form /foo/bar and not http://domain/foo/bar which is the
output of the request.res
13 matches
Mail list logo
