Re: Documentation overhaul specifics

2012-02-14 Thread Chris McDonough
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 10:19 -0800, Domen Kožar wrote: > Hi all, > > chipin is pretty easy to use, they don't take any fees: http://chipin.com/ Sounds good. If it doesn't work out with Kickstarter, I'll try that. > > I'd love to donate 50€. Great, thank you! > > Cheers, Domen > > On Feb 13,

Re: Documentation overhaul specifics

2012-02-14 Thread Domen Kožar
Hi all, chipin is pretty easy to use, they don't take any fees: http://chipin.com/ I'd love to donate 50€. Cheers, Domen On Feb 13, 9:52 pm, Eric Rasmussen wrote: > I originally wrote the Akhet auth demo at a time when there weren't any > examples showing how to integrate Pyramid's auth featur

Re: Documentation overhaul specifics

2012-02-13 Thread Eric Rasmussen
I originally wrote the Akhet auth demo at a time when there weren't any examples showing how to integrate Pyramid's auth features with SQLAlchemy. It might still be useful in that sense, for people who need a quick start guide to get from the standalone examples (usually global lists or dictionarie

Re: Documentation overhaul specifics

2012-02-13 Thread Michael Merickel
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Mike Orr wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Michael Merickel > wrote: > > Out of curiosity have you read > > http://michael.merickel.org/projects/pyramid_auth_demo/ and did it help > at > > all? It was originally written as an auth tutorial/demo separatel

Re: Documentation overhaul specifics

2012-02-13 Thread Mike Orr
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Michael Merickel wrote: > Out of curiosity have you read > http://michael.merickel.org/projects/pyramid_auth_demo/ and did it help at > all? It was originally written as an auth tutorial/demo separately, but I > did have goals of incorporating its ideas into the d

Re: Documentation overhaul specifics

2012-02-13 Thread Michael Merickel
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Benjamin Sims wrote: > Sorry to be late to the party, but I would like to pledge £50 (~$80 USD). > > In terms of concerns/suggestions, I'd particularly like the documentation > relating to authentication and authorisation to be expanded - relying on it > recently I

Re: Documentation overhaul specifics

2012-02-13 Thread Benjamin Sims
Sorry to be late to the party, but I would like to pledge £50 (~$80 USD). In terms of concerns/suggestions, I'd particularly like the documentation relating to authentication and authorisation to be expanded - relying on it recently I felt that references to the Glossary from the tutorial didn't g

Re: Documentation overhaul specifics

2012-02-13 Thread Mike Orr
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Iain Duncan wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Chris McDonough wrote: > I think that is actually better. I've seen countless times books getting > negative reviews for duplicating the online API reference, and it just > doesn't make sense to have that in b

Re: Documentation overhaul specifics

2012-02-13 Thread Iain Duncan
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Chris McDonough wrote: > Thanks to the amazing generosity of everyone here, it looks like we'll > be a "go" for a Pyramid documentation overhaul project (see the "need > your help to overhaul docs" thread for the genesis of this idea: > > http://groups.google.com/

Documentation overhaul specifics

2012-02-13 Thread Chris McDonough
Thanks to the amazing generosity of everyone here, it looks like we'll be a "go" for a Pyramid documentation overhaul project (see the "need your help to overhaul docs" thread for the genesis of this idea: http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss/browse_thread/thread/7bd833209369bc5f ). We