On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Joe Dallago wrote:
What does everyone use for hosting and why? I currently use bluehost, but I
just want to see what is out there.
I generally like really fast hardware, Rackspace has very generous boosting on
their VPS allocations and is up there or past linode
What does everyone use for hosting and why? I currently use bluehost, but I
just want to see what is out there.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To
I can't recommend webfaction enough. They've been great. Awesome support,
good pricing and they work for a wide variety of technology.
I have no affiliation with them, just a happy customer of 2 years.
On Mar 29, 2011 12:27 PM, Joe Dallago jd.dall...@gmail.com wrote:
What does everyone use for
there's also amazon ec2..
On Mar 29, 9:37 am, Brian O'Connor gatzby...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't recommend webfaction enough. They've been great. Awesome support,
good pricing and they work for a wide variety of technology.
I have no affiliation with them, just a happy customer of 2 years.
On
+1 for webfaction. I'm hosting a handful of Pylons and Pyramid apps on it
and haven't had any issues. There's no built-in installer for Pyramid yet
(there is for Pylons) but they have an option for custom applications and it
only took a few minutes to get up and running.
They also make it easy to
Was with webfaction for 3 years, always having problems with over selling
their shared servers. I actually ended up writing a script to monitor and
send a notice to the support when the load went too high. They swore up and
down that they monitored such things, but I had to include the offending
I like the VPS provider linode mainly because they have a 20ms ping time
from where I am. It's cool to be able to ssh into the server and have it
feel as close as the local machine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to
I second the other WebFaction recommendation - it's a really solid host
and you they give you *a lot* of control! For shared hosting it's a win.
For a dedicated box or vps I prefer RootBSD.
Joe Dallago jd.dall...@gmail.com writes:
What does everyone use for hosting and why? I currently use
Webfaction. I used Hostmonster for the longest time and they were okay. But
Webaction is fantastic, especially for python hosting.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Joe Dallago jd.dall...@gmail.com wrote:
What does everyone use for hosting and why? I currently use bluehost, but
I just want to
I tried out Webfaction for a few months but didn't care for them because they
kill processes that consume too much memory/cpu which I found pretty annoying.
If your website doesn't require much resources than they might be a good fit
but if your website receives a lot of traffic and/or you
I use pyramid on prgmr.com using nginx server. Very cheap. But they assume
you know how to set up server and everything. Their motto: 'we don't assume
you're stupid'. I can't ask for more.
On 30-Mar-2011 12:37 AM, Brian Oapos;Connor gatzby...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't recommend webfaction
ping reply from one of my amazon instances:
Reply from x.x.x.x: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=47
Reply from x.x.x.x: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=47
Reply from x.x.x.x: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=47
Reply from x.x.x.x: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=47
Reply from x.x.x.x: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=47
Figured you guys might
On 29.03.11 11:27, Joe Dallago wrote:
What does everyone use for hosting and why? I currently use bluehost,
but I just want to see what is out there.
I'm a happy Slicehost customer for more than 2 years (with several
servers). Not a single problem in this whole time.
--
You received
I currently use different setups and my preferred one is linode.com,
it's just awesome :)
On Mar 29, 12:27 pm, Joe Dallago jd.dall...@gmail.com wrote:
What does everyone use for hosting and why? I currently use bluehost, but I
just want to see what is out there.
--
You received this message
Linode is looking good. I like the idea of being able to have total control
over my box.
On Mar 29, 2011 12:56 PM, Blaise Laflamme bla...@laflamme.org wrote:
I currently use different setups and my preferred one is linode.com,
it's just awesome :)
On Mar 29, 12:27 pm, Joe Dallago
Linode is absolutely great. Good deal, too.
Their naked installs take some config to get up to speed, at least they did.
Some of the new deploy-script stuff (like Silver Lining type things) might
help you automate that process, or even making your own .deb that is empty
but requires all the stuff
Hi,
another Linode happy customer here.
Carlos de la Guardia
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:17 PM, guillermo cruz webjunki...@gmail.com wrote:
I also agree that Linode is great. And the support team is awesome. One time
Hotmail ask them to send an email to confirm I owned an IP address and they
17 matches
Mail list logo
