Am 25.04.2014, 02:08 Uhr, schrieb Andi Vajda va...@apache.org:
On Apr 24, 2014, at 15:44, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
I agree with you that making releases is important. However, when
votes are
called to
Nachricht-
Von: Andi Vajda [mailto:va...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 02:28
An: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: release votes
Hi all,
Given the tiny amount of interest the pylucene releases create, it's maybe
become unimportant to actually make
. April 2014 02:28
An: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: release votes
Hi all,
Given the tiny amount of interest the pylucene releases create, it's maybe
become unimportant to actually make PyLucene releases ?
The release votes have had an increasingly difficult time to garner the
three
On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Thomas Koch wrote:
I don't agree that it is unimportant to make PyLucene releases. Without a
ready-to-run software package the hurdles to use PyLucene are raised. It is
already not quite simple (for
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
I agree with you that making releases is important. However, when votes are
called to actually make them, it's been hard to get voters to respond.
Anyone can vote. Anyone with an interest should vote. Three PMC votes are
On Apr 24, 2014, at 15:44, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
I agree with you that making releases is important. However, when votes are
called to actually make them, it's been hard to get voters to respond.
Anyone
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
Given the tiny amount of interest the pylucene releases create, it's
maybe become unimportant to actually make PyLucene releases ?
The release votes have had an increasingly difficult time to garner
the three required PMC votes to pass. Non
