On Oct 15, 2009, at 9:42, Bill Janssen wrote:
Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 15.10.2009 07:01, schrieb Andi Vajda:
If distutils or the new fork grows the ability to build a regular
shared
library, I'd be less wedded to setuptools.
Maybe you want to contact the distribute guys which is a setup
Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Am 15.10.2009 07:01, schrieb Andi Vajda:
> > If distutils or the new fork grows the ability to build a regular shared
> > library, I'd be less wedded to setuptools.
>
> Maybe you want to contact the distribute guys which is a setuptools
> fork. I know that some Linux distr
Am 15.10.2009 07:01, schrieb Andi Vajda:
If distutils or the new fork grows the ability to build a regular shared
library, I'd be less wedded to setuptools.
Maybe you want to contact the distribute guys which is a setuptools
fork. I know that some Linux distributions are using distribute alre
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Bill Janssen wrote:
Andi Vajda wrote:
Bill, could you please expand a bit on that red flag you just alluded
to for those of us who don't follow the distutils list.
The big problem with setuptools is that it's a widely ambitious package
with featuritis and I-know-better
Andi Vajda wrote:
> Bill, could you please expand a bit on that red flag you just alluded
> to for those of us who don't follow the distutils list.
The big problem with setuptools is that it's a widely ambitious package
with featuritis and I-know-better-itis, maintained from a private
codebase b
