On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On 30/03/11 04:40, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
> [cut]
>> So to my question - just how broken is the JVM backend? Are there
>> workarounds that would allow the Java code to get generated?
>
> so, now the jvm (and cli) translati
Hi Frank,
On 30/03/11 04:40, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
[cut]
> So to my question - just how broken is the JVM backend? Are there
> workarounds that would allow the Java code to get generated?
so, now the jvm (and cli) translation works again. You can just type
./translate.py -b jvm, and the f
fwierzbi...@gmail.com, 30.03.2011 04:40:
> I've been thinking about the first steps towards collaboration between
> the Jython project and the PyPy project. It looks like it isn't going
> to be too long before we are all (CPython, PyPy, IronPython, Jython,
> etc) working on a single shared reposito
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> On 31/03/11 21:57, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>
>>> Ok, so if Ademan tells me that he's not going to work on the
>>> ootype-virtualref
>>> branch, I'll try to finish the work so you can start playing with it.
>>
>> Note to frank: this is kind
On 31/03/11 21:57, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> Ok, so if Ademan tells me that he's not going to work on the
>> ootype-virtualref
>> branch, I'll try to finish the work so you can start playing with it.
>
> Note to frank: this is kind of cool but only needed for the JIT,
> otherwise it's a norma
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> On 30/03/11 19:37, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> My thoughts here are taking a very primitive step - that is run the
>> JVM translation and look at the generated Java - then see what needs
>> to be modified so that I could use the generat
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> On 30/03/11 19:37, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> My thoughts here are taking a very primitive step - that is run the
>> JVM translation and look at the generated Java - then see what needs
>> to be modified so that I could use the generat
On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:18 AM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
>
>> I ask
>> because I would like to evaluate the generated Java parser as a
>> potential replacement for our current ANTLR based parser. It seems
>> like a nice baby step towards real collaboration since it seems like a
>> relatively easy place
On 30/03/11 19:37, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
> My thoughts here are taking a very primitive step - that is run the
> JVM translation and look at the generated Java - then see what needs
> to be modified so that I could use the generated Java parser from
> Jython. At this stage I would be using
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:37 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
>> I have to warn you that at the moment, you cannot invoke any Java code from
>> RPython. Implementing it has been on my todo list for years now :-(, but I
>> never managed to f
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> I have to warn you that at the moment, you cannot invoke any Java code from
> RPython. Implementing it has been on my todo list for years now :-(, but I
> never managed to find the time and the motivation to do it. However, for
> using the
Hi Frank,
On 30/03/11 04:40, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It was nice meeting up with many of you at PyCon!
>
> I've been thinking about the first steps towards collaboration between
> the Jython project and the PyPy project. It looks like it isn't going
> to be too long before we
Hi all,
It was nice meeting up with many of you at PyCon!
I've been thinking about the first steps towards collaboration between
the Jython project and the PyPy project. It looks like it isn't going
to be too long before we are all (CPython, PyPy, IronPython, Jython,
etc) working on a single shar
13 matches
Mail list logo
