On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Andy wrote:
> What causes Tornado's memory usage to grow constantly? Is it a bug in PyPy
> or Tornado?
PyPy. It does get freed at *some point*, but some point is too far in
the future. It was about objects like sockets and hashes not
accounting for memory usage by
What causes Tornado's memory usage to grow constantly? Is it a bug in PyPy or
Tornado?
It *might* be the same thing as with tornado where memory usage grows
constantly. Justin peel is working on it and it'll be in 1.7 some time
soon (it does not have to though,
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Igor Katson wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 02:50 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Andy wrote:
>>>
>>> 15 times more memory? That's a lot.
>>> Interestingly Quora reported that their PyPy processes were only 50%
>>> larger
>>> than CPytho
On 10/08/2011 02:50 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Andy wrote:
15 times more memory? That's a lot.
Interestingly Quora reported that their PyPy processes were only 50% larger
than CPython ones:
http://www.quora.com/Quora-Infrastructure/Did-Quoras-switch-to-PyPy-r
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Andy wrote:
> 15 times more memory? That's a lot.
> Interestingly Quora reported that their PyPy processes were only 50% larger
> than CPython ones:
> http://www.quora.com/Quora-Infrastructure/Did-Quoras-switch-to-PyPy-result-in-increased-memory-consumption
>
> "ou
15 times more memory? That's a lot.
Interestingly Quora reported that their PyPy processes were only 50% larger
than CPython ones:
http://www.quora.com/Quora-Infrastructure/Did-Quoras-switch-to-PyPy-result-in-increased-memory-consumption
"our PyPy worker processes themselves take approximately
Hi
We're gathering success stories for the website. Anyone feel like
providing name, company and some data how pypy worked for them (we
accept info how it didn't work on bugs.pypy.org all the time :)
Cheers,
fijal
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@pyth
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Leonardo Santagada wrote:
> No one complains about it, but Solr does do a warmup phase while
> bringing the server up before starting to serve real requests.
FWIW, this is something I often do with Flask and Werkzeug (on PyPy and
gunicorn) after restarting - pass
On 10/07/2011 08:50 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Igor Katson wrote:
When I first started benchmarking one of my Django sites,
http://trip-travel.ru/ (using postgres driver pypq),
I was disappointed by the results. PyPy was visually much slower than
cPython (I ju
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Max Lavrenov wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I've written small program that show the problem.
> http://paste.pocoo.org/show/488730/
>
> You can test it with this line ab -n 1000 http://localhost:8032/
>
> After 810 request i am starting to get errors
> http://paste.pocoo.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Ian P. Cooke wrote:
>
> On Oct 07, 2011, at 11:50 , Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Igor Katson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Though, the need to load the page 500 times after each server reload is not
>
> comfortable.
>
> [...]
> I've heard pe
No one complains about it, but Solr does do a warmup phase while
bringing the server up before starting to serve real requests.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
>
> On 7 October 2011 18:08, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Michael Foord wrote
On 7 October 2011 18:08, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7 October 2011 17:50, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Igor Katson
> wrote:
> >> > When I first started benchmarking one of my Django site
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
>
> On 7 October 2011 17:50, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Igor Katson wrote:
>> > When I first started benchmarking one of my Django sites,
>> > http://trip-travel.ru/ (using postgres driver pypq),
>> > I w
On 7 October 2011 17:50, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Igor Katson wrote:
> > When I first started benchmarking one of my Django sites,
> > http://trip-travel.ru/ (using postgres driver pypq),
> > I was disappointed by the results. PyPy was visually much slower than
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Igor Katson wrote:
> When I first started benchmarking one of my Django sites,
> http://trip-travel.ru/ (using postgres driver pypq),
> I was disappointed by the results. PyPy was visually much slower than
> cPython (I just looked at how the site loads in the browse
On 7 October 2011 07:35, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 16:40, Michael Foord wrote:
> >> > And is that a good enough reason to call it "pypy-c.exe" and risk
> >> > confusing users?
> >>
> >> Is it confusing?
> >
> > Yes
>
> Ah, if you say so. Fixed.
>
>
Ever the man of actio
When I first started benchmarking one of my Django sites,
http://trip-travel.ru/ (using postgres driver pypq),
I was disappointed by the results. PyPy was visually much slower than
cPython (I just looked at how the site loads in the browser)
But today I got some incredible results, I finally ma
Hello all
I've written small program that show the problem.
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/488730/
You can test it with this line ab -n 1000 http://localhost:8032/
After 810 request i am starting to get errors
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/488732/
if i start it with --jit off it work fine
Yes, pl
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/10/5 Martin Kretschmar :
> > Microsofts free WinDbg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinDbg) can also
> attach
> > to running processes.
>
> A release build of pypy contains no debug information
> Believe me, a debugger won't
20 matches
Mail list logo
