Re: [pypy-dev] cppyy: C++ bindings for PyPy

2012-04-22 Thread wlavrijsen
Hi Maciej, It'll at the very least run tests nightly so we'll make sure we don't break it (we can install reflex on tannit). that, to me, sounds great! Best regards, Wim -- wlavrij...@lbl.gov--+1 (510) 486 6411--www.lavrijsen.net

Re: [pypy-dev] cppyy: C++ bindings for PyPy

2012-04-22 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:42 AM, wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > > Quick question - if it's mature, why not merge it to default? I presume it >> should be turned off, since there is a sizeable dependency, but still >> having it in default can be good. >> > > the dependency is the main issue: for it to b

Re: [pypy-dev] cppyy: C++ bindings for PyPy

2012-04-22 Thread wlavrijsen
Hi Maciej, Quick question - if it's mature, why not merge it to default? I presume it should be turned off, since there is a sizeable dependency, but still having it in default can be good. the dependency is the main issue: for it to build, it requires headers and libs from Reflex. Completely

Re: [pypy-dev] cppyy: C++ bindings for PyPy

2012-04-22 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:08 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > as detailed in a couple of blog posts in the past (*), for some time now we > have been working on making C++ bindings through the Reflex package > available > on PyPy, in the form of the "cppyy" module. Software is never done, and > that > is tru

Re: [pypy-dev] output readable c

2012-04-22 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:35, wrote: >    Maciej> I would really like this sort of changes to come with it's own >    Maciej> tests (ones that check what was compiled preferably). > > What might such tests look like? It is an issue: unit-testing this kind of "detail" is a bit hard, I agree

[pypy-dev] cppyy: C++ bindings for PyPy

2012-04-22 Thread wlavrijsen
Hi, as detailed in a couple of blog posts in the past (*), for some time now we have been working on making C++ bindings through the Reflex package available on PyPy, in the form of the "cppyy" module. Software is never done, and that is true also in this case, but it has reached a level of matur

Re: [pypy-dev] output readable c

2012-04-22 Thread skip
Maciej> I would really like this sort of changes to come with it's own Maciej> tests (ones that check what was compiled preferably). What might such tests look like? That is, how would they be different than tests which demonstrate that the current translation code is correct? (Are ther

Re: [pypy-dev] kwargsdict-strategy

2012-04-22 Thread Carl Friedrich Bolz
Hi Armin, Armin Rigo wrote: >Can you have a look at speed.python.org? It seems that merging the >kwargsdict-strategy branch had mostly the effect of making >twisted_iteration slower :-( Yes, seems Twisted is really the worst case for argument matching. My new branch should help, I can disable

Re: [pypy-dev] output readable c

2012-04-22 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
Hi. I would really like this sort of changes to come with it's own tests (ones that check what was compiled preferably). On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 7:01 AM, bookaa wrote: > ** > Now I can pass the test_backendoptimized and targetnopstandalone. > > Files attached. > > Please tell me if any bugs > >