Re: [pypy-dev] starting a release cycle

2016-11-02 Thread Carl Friedrich Bolz
FWIW, there is this: https://bitbucket.org/okusche/bitbucket-curl-upload-to-repo-downloads Which I haven't tested, but the author says works. Carl Friedrich On November 2, 2016 5:27:26 PM GMT+01:00, Matti Picus wrote: >On 02/11/16 17:42, Richard Plangger wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Would someone e

Re: [pypy-dev] starting a release cycle

2016-11-02 Thread Matti Picus
On 02/11/16 17:42, Richard Plangger wrote: Hi, Would someone else like to pair with me for the release so they could do the next one? Yes, I would like to help out here! In cape town I have done the same release procedure for pypy3 (Python 3.3). It annoyed me :) I think most of the steps cou

Re: [pypy-dev] starting a release cycle

2016-11-02 Thread Richard Plangger
Hi, > Would someone else like to pair with me for the release so they could do > the next one? Yes, I would like to help out here! In cape town I have done the same release procedure for pypy3 (Python 3.3). It annoyed me :) I think most of the steps could be done automatically (ideally a script

Re: [pypy-dev] starting a release cycle

2016-11-02 Thread wlavrijsen
Matti, On Wednesday 2016-11-02 17:11, Matti Picus wrote: Are there outstanding branches that just have to be in this release or issues that we consider blockers? I want at some point in the near future push cling-support onto master. I assume there are no objections (if there are, please speak

[pypy-dev] starting a release cycle

2016-11-02 Thread Matti Picus
I am thinking of pushing out what I guess should be PyPy2.7-5.6.0, we released PyPy2.7-v5.4.0 on Aug 31 and PyPy3.3-v5.5.0 on Oct 12. Are there outstanding branches that just have to be in this release or issues that we consider blockers? Would someone else like to pair with me for the releas

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy-config

2016-11-02 Thread Matti Picus
On 02/11/16 12:41, Armin Rigo wrote: Hi, On 20 October 2016 at 21:18, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: AFAICT, python-config is provided by the downstream package maintainer. For instance, in debian it is provided by their python-dev package. Since it is not an integral part of python, I'm not sure it

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy-config

2016-11-02 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi, On 20 October 2016 at 21:18, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: >> AFAICT, python-config is provided by the downstream package maintainer. >> For instance, in debian it is provided by their python-dev package. Since it >> is not an integral part of python, I'm not sure it should be an integral >> part of

Re: [pypy-dev] PGO Optimized Binary

2016-11-02 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi, On 31 October 2016 at 22:28, Singh, Yashwardhan wrote: > We applied compiler assisted optimization technique called PGO or Profile > Guided Optimization while building PyPy, and found performance got improved > by up to 22.4% on the Grand Unified Python Benchmark (GUPB) from “hg clone > ht

Re: [pypy-dev] Colo in Germany for the Windows build slave?

2016-11-02 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Yury, On 1 November 2016 at 18:20, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > You are right, maybe speaking sysadmin lingo wasn't the smartest idea on my > part, but then again, not sure anyone who's not using the word "colo" > everyday is going to be able to help... Fwiw, I guess you mean https://en.wikipedia

Re: [pypy-dev] Colo in Germany for the Windows build slave?

2016-11-02 Thread Wouter van Heijst
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 18:20:35 +0100, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > Hi Matti, > > >Not that I live anywhere near Cologne, but maybe better defining the > >request might help tease out a response here... > > You are right, maybe speaking sysadmin lingo wasn't the smartest idea on my > part, but then

Re: [pypy-dev] SSL module Py3.5, Github? Bitbucket?

2016-11-02 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Richard, On 31 October 2016 at 16:20, Richard Plangger wrote: > I'm unsure what the current rule for new project is. Github? Bitbucket? > > VMProf was initiated on Github, what did we learn from that experiment? > Is the bar lower for new contributions? +1 for Github. (I personally prefer hg