On Friday 18 February 2005 01:32, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
All Qt names have the form Q+english word(s)
Most do, but not all. PYSIGNAL, IO_Open, bitBlt, qRed, etc
Im sure you were aware of some of those, but the problem with
from X import *
is that you need to be aware of _all_ of them.
Your
We've been using PyQT/PyKDE here at Linspire for some time now to
develop a handful of applications. One of these is Lsongs, and it has
grown quite large and has a very large memory footprint. We're trying
to reduce this a bit in various ways (switching to gstreamer from
libxine for
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 11:47 -0800, Brian Thomason wrote:
We've been using PyQT/PyKDE here at Linspire for some time now to
develop a handful of applications. One of these is Lsongs, and it has
grown quite large and has a very large memory footprint. We're trying
to reduce this a bit in
Brian Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been using PyQT/PyKDE here at Linspire for some time now to
develop a handful of applications. One of these is Lsongs, and it has
grown quite large and has a very large memory footprint. We're trying
to reduce this a bit in various ways
I think we are all arguing from the same side of the issue.
I agree that namespaces are important, I'm just asking several questions:
1. Why add an additional namespace for qt4 related functionality (we
didn't do this for qt3)? In terms of code maintainability, it will
actually save me
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:02:47 -0800
Longson, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we are all arguing from the same side of the issue.
I agree that namespaces are important, I'm just asking several questions:
1. Why add an additional namespace for qt4 related functionality (we
didn't
On Thursday 17 February 2005 20:47, Brian Thomason wrote:
We've been using PyQT/PyKDE here at Linspire for some time now to
develop a handful of applications. One of these is Lsongs, and it
has grown quite large and has a very large memory footprint. We're
trying to reduce this a bit in
On Friday 18 February 2005 18:00, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
and here's a more detailed comparison from the two:
9.0: 9.2:
sip version: 4.1.1 sip version: 4.0.1
Qt version: 3.2.1 Qt version: 3.3.3
PyQt version: 3.13
On Friday 18 February 2005 06:38, Brian Thomason wrote:
We've been using PyQT/PyKDE here at Linspire for some time now to
develop a handful of applications. One of these is Lsongs, and it has
grown quite large and has a very large memory footprint. We're trying
to reduce this a bit in
Am Donnerstag, 17. Februar 2005 22:58 schrieb Albert Chin:
We've built Eric 3.6.1 on Solaris 2.6-9/SPARC, HP-UX 11.x, Tru64 UNIX
5.1, IRIX 6.5, AIX 5.x, and RHEL 3.0. At the least, the main window
comes up :)
In the main window, a section is devoted to a Python session. We see
the following:
On Thursday 17 February 2005 9:56 pm, Nahuel Greco wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:03:16 - (GMT)
Phil Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentoo (x86 and amd64). I didn't run the C++ test - I was refering to the
original Python test that Torsten sent me.
Ok, I was confused because I
11 matches
Mail list logo
