Re: [review] [PyKDE] PyQT module size

2005-03-05 Thread Giovanni Bajo
Phil Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think I'm just going to go with the other users' recommendation of >> nabbing the latest sip and compiling with some different flags with GCC4 >> and see if that gets me some quick wins. My mind is too small and >> fragile to attempt the changes you p

Re: [review] [PyKDE] PyQT module size

2005-03-04 Thread Phil Thompson
> I think I'm just going to go with the other users' recommendation of > nabbing the latest sip and compiling with some different flags with GCC4 > and see if that gets me some quick wins. My mind is too small and > fragile to attempt the changes you proposed above without screwing > things up or

Re: [review] [PyKDE] PyQT module size

2005-03-03 Thread Brian Thomason
Many thanks for the kind replies all. Jim Bublitz wrote: I seem to recall the actual overhead for a fairly large program using several PyQt modules and 5 or 6 PyKDE modules is somewhere around 6-8MB according to 'free'. Another way to look at it is that the *first* app has a lot of overhead,

Re: [review] [PyKDE] PyQT module size

2005-02-18 Thread Jim Bublitz
On Friday 18 February 2005 06:38, Brian Thomason wrote: > We've been using PyQT/PyKDE here at Linspire for some time now to > develop a handful of applications. One of these is Lsongs, and it has > grown quite large and has a very large memory footprint. We're trying > to reduce this a bit in var