On 2/17/07, Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know about the others, however I want to speak to the issue of
> 3101 and 3102, since I wrote them - the main reason that those PEPs
> haven't been accepted is that there's no sample implementation to
> evaluate. (At least, I'm not aware of any
And it's in the p3yk branch, too.
The main reason these are all still drafts is that I expect that
implementing them may cause a certain amount of redesign, and in some
cases the spec isn't entirely clear. The "real" acceptance status (in
my head) is all over the map -- 3102 is obviously accepted,
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> And it's in the p3yk branch, too.
>
> The main reason these are all still drafts is that I expect that
> implementing them may cause a certain amount of redesign, and in some
> cases the spec isn't entirely clear. The "real" acceptance status (in
> my head) is all over
I have added python-ideas to the Cc list, and suggest removing
python-3000 from additional replies.
BJörn Lindqvist gave an example explaining why he might want to
re-evaluate mutable default arguments. It still looks like like buggy
code, but it isn't the error I was expecting -- and I think it
