Miki Tebeka [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I think the name is not good, should be toepoch or something like that.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2736
__
Andrews Patrick Rocha Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The files Python/compile.c and Python/pythonrun.c depends of the
_symtable (Python/symtable.c and Include/symtable.h).
What I do for remove _symtable in py3k?
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Andrews, this discussion would be more appropriate to the mailing list,
but anyway: I believe you're mixing things up. When PEP 3108 says remove
symtable/_symtable, it must be talking only about symtable.py and
symtablemodule.c, not
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Benjamin: please reformat to PEP 8, then this is okay to check in. Don't
forget docs and NEWS updates.
--
assignee: - benjamin.peterson
nosy: +benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl
resolution: - accepted
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Duplicate of #2742.
--
resolution: - duplicate
status: open - closed
superseder: - example code does not work
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2763
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Applied the documentation patch in r63039. Thanks for your efforts!
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2742
New submission from Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Let's make an intentional syntax error...
print Testing\
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning single-quoted string
Please focus on the part of the error message that states while
scanning single-quoted string. How can Python claim it scanned a
Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I have e-mailed Guido van Rossum about this. He replied: Good find.
Please file a bug on bugs.python.org. If that wasn't a bug, he wouldn't
have said that, would he?
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changes by Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
versions: +Python 2.1.1, Python 2.1.2, Python 2.2, Python 2.2.1, Python 2.2.2,
Python 2.2.3, Python 2.3, Python 2.4, Python 2.5, Python 2.6
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2816
Changes by Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
versions: +3rd party
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2816
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Martin McNickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10280/add_header_complete.patch
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2756
__
___
Changes by Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10279/mailbox-replace_rfc822.patch
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue756982
Changes by Martin McNickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10201/add_header_complete.patch
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2756
__
Changes by Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
versions: +Python 3.0 -Python 2.5
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2816
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Robert Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
It seems single-quoted doesn't mean the actual quotation sign used but
rather how many you used. Compare the multiline triple quote syntax:
$ cat foo.py
bar
$ python foo.py
File foo.py, line 3
^
SyntaxError: EOF while scanning
Changes by Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10272/mailbox.py.patch2
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue756982
Neil Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
datetime has fromtimestamp already, so using totimestamp keeps naming
consistency (see toordinal and fromordinal).
--
nosy: +Neil Muller
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2736
Changes by Simon Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +hodgestar
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1491
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This is not a bug in my opinion -- Robert has stated why.
However, since you contacted Guido, let him decide. :)
--
assignee: - gvanrossum
nosy: +georg.brandl, gvanrossum
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New submission from Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Changed a bit and committed as r63043.
--
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2812
__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks, committed patch as r63045.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2814
__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I removed the old classes in 3k. There remains one usage of rfc822, as
the default factory of Maildir. It's replaced by None in the patch
here; is that safe to do?
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
Tracker
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
It refers to the docs in the Python docs. I tried to clarify that in r63052.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2709
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
OK, I think I fixed the remaining locations in r63055.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2147
__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Is there a way to run the tree Python?
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2800
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Changes by Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
status: pending - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2129
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Okay, this should now be clearer in r63057.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2741
__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The replacement is TestLoader().loadTestsFromTestCase(), and it's
already in a prominent place in the docs:
Instead of :func:`unittest.main`, there are other ways to run the tests
with a
finer level of control, less terse output, and no
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks for the patch! Reviewed and committed as r63053.
--
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2659
__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks, fixed in r63058.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2452
__
Neil Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This patch combines the two earlier patches, and also updates the
docstrings and os.rst to reflect the changed behaviour.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10281/posixmodule_2.patch
__
Tracker [EMAIL
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
After talking to Guilherme on IRC, I'd like to propose this new patch.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10282/tk_doc.patch
__
Tracker [EMAIL
New submission from Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To create a tuple with one element, you need to do this:
my_tuple = (1,)# Note the trailing comma after the value 1
type(my_tuple)
type 'tuple'
But if you do this
my_tuple = (1)
type(my_tuple)
type 'int'
you don't get a tuple. I thought
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
But we need parentheses for grouping!
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2817
__
New submission from Luyang Han [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
when use xml.dom.pulldom module to parse a large xml file, if all the
information is saved in one xml file, the module can handle it in the
following way without construction the whole DOM:
events = xml.dom.pulldom.parse('file.xml')
for
A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I've applied Facundo's version of the patch in r63059.
--
nosy: +akuchling
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1792
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10284/othergui.rst.diff
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2709
__
___
A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Brett backed out my commit in r63002 because I forgot to include the
distutils.config module. Re-committed in r63014 and r63060.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1858
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Reviewed and committed in r63061
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1267629
_
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
status: open - closed
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1267629
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
That's an absolute no-starter. Not the parentheses make the tuple, the
commas do. The empty tuple is the exception, not the rule.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - rejected
status: open - closed
__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks, committed both patches in r63066.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2709
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
As the term single-quoted string is clearly ambiguous, I propose to
change the error message to just string (or perhaps string literal,
but then you'd have to change the triple-quoted message to
triple-quoted string literal too for
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
OK, done so in r63068.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2816
__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Committed the test and added new docs in r63067. Thanks!
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1326
__
Changes by Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
components: +IDLE
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2710
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks, committed patch as r63069.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2787
__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks, fixed in r63070, r63071 (2.5).
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2803
__
Changes by Jean Brouwers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10286/mathmodule.c.2.6a3.diff
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2819
__
___
Changes by Jean Brouwers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10287/test_math_sum1.py
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2819
__
___
Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
It would be better to say
End of line while scanning string (string, line 1)
and
End of f... while scanning multi-line string (string, line 1)
These messages really need to be clear, so putting EOF for example
(which I really don't know what it
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Is there a way to run the tree Python?
Currently, that should be possible, as the documentation is
built after Python. However, in the long term, cross-compilation
needs to be considered (to AMD64 on an x86 machine); then you
can't run the
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Just in case the previous comments aren't clear: Would you rather see
py (3+4)*5
35
or
py (3+4)*5
(7, 7, 7, 7, 7)
--
nosy: +loewis
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2817
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I'm working on the new package tkinter and dialogs merging where
appropriate.
--
nosy: +gpolo
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2775
__
David Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I don't think this really addresses the issue properly...
The original docstring read:
+Note that not specifying sep (or using None) will cause\n\
+empty strings to be removed from the output. thus ' '.strip()\n\
+returns []. while ' '.strip('
New submission from Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've removed the Mac modules. The Bazaar branch is at
http://code.python.org/python/users/benjamin.peterson/mac_module_removal/.
--
assignee: brett.cannon
components: Extension Modules
messages: 66648
nosy: benjamin.peterson,
Daniel Stutzbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
After several failed attempts at making a test case, and stepping
through C code with a debugger, I see that my initial diagnose is
quite wrong. RegQueryInfoKey *does* return the sizes in units of
bytes (even though the Microsoft
Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Martin I see the point now. I appologize for not having the clear head
of seeing the possible damage that my feature request would make. I take
my request back.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New submission from Adam Getchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Picking the canonical example of unit test:
import random
import unittest
class TestSequenceFunctions(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.seq = range(10)
def testshuffle(self):
# make sure the shuffled
New submission from Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have a suggestion that would make the
http://svn.python.org/view?rev=63068view=rev look ever more clear. It
would be better to have this kind of error messages:
expect = End of line while scanning string (string, line 1)
and
expect End of f...
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Stop bothering us.
--
resolution: - invalid
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2822
__
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This looks pretty good at first glance. Will review more throughly
later this week. It does need docs and unittests.
--
assignee: - rhettinger
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
rfc822 is replaced by None in the patch here; is that safe to do?
Yes. That's what mailbox documentation says:
Parameter factory is a callable object that accepts a file-like message
representation [...] and returns a custom
New submission from anatoly techtonik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It would be convenient to use links in the bottom of documentation pages
for bugreporting that directly connect to bugtracker search form. I.e.
Report bug on this page and Report bug in this module.
--
assignee: georg.brandl
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
-1. This would make a fairly pessimistic view of Python, making it sound
as if reporting a bug is a primary thing that one might to do with it.
--
nosy: +loewis
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Implemented in 2.6 as r63078. I'll port this to py3k shortly.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2802
__
___
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Patch regarding the move to tkinter package added.
What this patch does
* Moved lib-tk to tkinter and renamed modules according to PEP 3108
* Merged tkFileDialog into filedialog
* Merged tkSimpleDialog into
New submission from anatoly techtonik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ZipFile allows to add the same file to archive twice. I bet it is not
intended behavior for many users who would like to either replace file
inside of archive or get runtime warning about duplicate file to be
added.
Nikolas Coukouma [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I can't reproduce this with r63075...
--
nosy: +nikolasco
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2378
__
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Some comments/questions:
(1) It seems wasteful to wrap every addition in PyFPE_START/END_PROTECT,
and to check for NaNs and infinities after every addition. I'd wrap the
whole thing in a single PyFPE_START/END_PROTECT, replace _math_sum_add
New submission from Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is a patch I made to make this messages clear now. I hope you like it.
--
files: test_eof.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 4
nosy: chester
severity: normal
status: open
title: Quote-type recognition bug [got a patch!]
Added file:
Pedro Werneck [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I get it with r63075, r63085, on Linux.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2378
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
One more question:
What are the use cases for an exact summation algorithm? That is, in what
situations does one care about exactness rather than simply accuracy? I
know that loss of accuracy is a problem in things like numeric integration
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Removed the last rfc822 reference from 3k's mailbox.py in r63091.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue756982
Changes by Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +gvanrossum
versions: +3rd party, Python 2.1.1, Python 2.1.2, Python 2.2, Python 2.2.1,
Python 2.2.2, Python 2.2.3, Python 2.3, Python 2.4, Python 2.5, Python 2.6,
Python 3.0
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Okay, r63092 should satisfy you then. :)
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2809
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Committed code and doc patches as r63094. Thanks!
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2250
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
IMO, the current behavior is the least problematic. It also mirrors the
rest of Python's posix-wrapping calls: if something usable is returned,
use it; if NULL is returned, raise an error.
For most people, Unknown error XXX or Value error:
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Implemented in 3.0 as r63093. I'm closing this issue.
I added the C code that does the grouping insertion as
_PyString_InsertThousandsGrouping and _PyUnicode_InsertThousandsGrouping
(in 3.0). This might be useful to others, although the API is
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Georg, any special reason for not removing rfc822 references from
test_mailbox? That section of the patch was not merged.
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue756982
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Okay, removed that too in r63096.
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue756982
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Committed as r63097.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2535
__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
First of all, you don't say which type these methods belong to. I assume
you mean string.Template.
What good would that be? Those extra 5 characters to type shouldn't be
the problem.
Many template strings have only defined keys, and it is a
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I think we should add a deprecation warning for those classes in 2.6,
right?
As we're not removing the whole module, what's the right place to put
that? On the __init__ method of each class?
__
Tracker
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I added a deprecation notice to the docs. That should be enough.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2814
__
___
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Can you elaborate how you get the printed exception? When running your
code as a script under 2.5 or trunk, I don't get such a message.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I think a warning would be sensible here. The behavior is certainly not
what I would expect.
--
nosy: +alanmcintyre, georg.brandl
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2824
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Lowering priority.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
priority: normal - low
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1649238
_
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Won't this present backwards-compatibility problems if non-ASCII str
content is written?
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1470548
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
test_cl was already changed not to run as an import side-effect; I don't
think unittest is necessary here.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - rejected
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The test suite doesn't pass any longer when the patch is applied.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1713041
_
Changes by Andrews Patrick Rocha Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10292/symtable_removed_on_py3k.diff
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2775
__
Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Agreed, having it lie about the size is the WORST possible behavior
because it will silently hide problems. Lets not do that.
But I must've missed something, why can't __len__ return the correct
value? Merely because range() is broken and
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Gregory P. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..
But I must've missed something, why can't __len__ return the correct
value?
The problem is the C signature of the sq_length slot:
typedef Py_ssize_t
New submission from Sven Siegmund [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have a source code which IDLE 3.0a5 cannot parse, but Python 3.0a5
can (also attached):
#!/usr/bin/python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
def načtiSlovník(zdroj='slovník.txt'):
soubor = open(zdroj, mode='r', encoding='utf_8')
řádky =
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This should be fixed differently (directly applying the RE to bytes
objects), but it needs a re that handles bytes first.
--
assignee: - georg.brandl
nosy: +georg.brandl
priority: high - critical
__
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I though Georg already did this in r63068.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2825
__
Changes by Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: -gvanrossum
resolution: - invalid
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2825
__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
pattern.sub() imports the SRE Python module (to call its subx()) with
PyImport_Import -- that C functions uses a dummy list ['__doc__'] to get
the correct module for dotted import paths.
The import of an additional module is gone now that re is
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
type: - feature request
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue678464
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
