Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Oops, _framesize already takes sampwidth into account. So there is a
problem somewhere else, since reading the wave file is returning the
number of frames multiplied by the sampwidth.
___
Python tracker rep
Changes by Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file12688/issue_4913.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4913
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Given the name of the function related to the problem: writeframesraw,
it seems to be more correct to remove the sampwidth multiplication from
the other case (not add it in the other one), since you must already
pass the data multiplied
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ah, yes :) But in the other case (the one where it is currently
multiplied) the multiplication happens because data is formatted to
either bytes, shorts or longs, so without the multiplication data length
would end up being divided by 1, 2 or 4
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
I don't know what I was thinking when I said that, the check you are
doing in the patch is fine. And just to answer your next question: it
would raise ValueError.
Also, it would be good to add the other missing search switches.
--
nosy
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
I can't reproduce this on python 2.4.4 (or any newer version) using
windows vista, so this is either specific to the tk included in python
2.4.2 or tk and your specific os version.
If you still have this problem, report it at
http
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
The bug mentioned by the OP doesn't occur with the newer installers,
closing.
--
nosy: +gpolo
resolution: - out of date
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
The problem with the backspace key was fixed in python 2.6 when using
the windows installer at least.
I didn't check yet if it is specific to tcl/tk or if it involves
tkinter.
___
Python tracker rep
Changes by Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4676
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
It would be nice if the OP could confirm that the bug described by
Daniel is the same one as he gets. I can reproduce it on linux on all
the versions I marked, but didn't have time to fix it yet.
To the OP: If you are running Windows, try
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Patch against trunk attached.
It fixes only the first problem reported, and I can't reproduce the
second one.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12601/issue_4676.diff
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Can you add some example ?
Is the bug new to python 2.6 ?
--
nosy: +gpolo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4836
Changes by Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - duplicate
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4840
Changes by Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12603/issue4844.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4844
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Victor, you seem to be confusing code that supports it with functions
that use it. There are some conditional code inside Tkapp_MainLoop that
depends on self being available, that is what Martin meant by code that
supports it, and since it would
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Now, I'm much more in favour to remove it from moduleMethods than from
adjusting it to work in py3k.
Would you apply the same reasoning to the other Tkapp methods available
on _tkinter
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
But I don't see a RPC being used there, I just see some polling.
Consider Tkapp_Call (e.g.). If this is invoked in the Tk interpreter
thread, then there is a direct call to Tcl_EvalObjv
Changes by Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - duplicate
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4823
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here is a patch, two actually. The next one deprecates the functions in
trunk
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12574/issue3638.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
Changes by Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12575/deprecated_funcs.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3638
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
These look fine. I think further changes are necessary:
tkinter/__init__.py tries to load createfilehandler/deletefilehandler;
this becomes redundant.
Indeed, I forgot to look into the Python code.
I also see as redundant the checks
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
I get an empty string with the text below, but I was expecting some
s/text/test
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3638
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks Martin,
trunk: r68231 (blocked on py3k)
py3k: r68237
release30-maint: r68239
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
title: tkinter.mainloop() is meaningless and crash: remove it - Remove module
level functions
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Uh, I forgot about the code removal in __init__ in the first commits.
r68242, r68244 now
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3638
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Do you still need a review for this, Guilherme? If you just need a quick
code check I can see if I can make the time for this, but my tkinter
knowledge is lacking so it won't be very in-depth. Hopefully this is all
isolated enough that even
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
As for the testing question, I am not sure I understand what you are
asking. Are you asking if the tests can stay integrated with tkinter's
existing tests?
There are no tests for tkinter, except for some few ones for _tkinter
basic
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
I see some issues related to scrolling under macosx were fixed in tk
8.4.13, but I can't test them since I don't have a mac.
If scrolling doesn't work with the example below then I can just say the
problem is indeed with tk, but you could try
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix but let me tell what you can do to solve
the problem yourself (this may be added somewhere else then, like in the
tkinter wiki).
First, check the keysym you get when pressing Shift-BackSpace:
import Tkinter
def
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Just for future reference it is now on
http://tkinter.unpy.net/wiki/Linux_Shift-Backspace
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1482122
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
I would actually prefer to move xview and yview method to classes like
it was done in xview_yview.patch (I've done this on a personal branch
some time ago too, but named them as XScroll, YScroll), we can see they
are used in several places
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed the issue now.
_tkinter.call needs to use the TCL_EVAL_GLOBAL flag since all the
variables in Tkinter are global variables.
Matthias: your issue about the pattern should be placed in a different
issue.
--
keywords: +patch
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
I was about to mark this as invalid when I found out I had patched
tkinter/filedialog.py myself. Nevertheless, this is a duplicate of issue4406
--
nosy: +gpolo
resolution: - duplicate
status: open - closed
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'm moving this to release blocker since it went unnoticed in the 3.0
release.
--
priority: - release blocker
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4406
New submission from Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
Right now PythonCmd is using the Tcl interpreter stored in self-interp,
but this is unsafe and since it is a Tcl_CmdProc it already receives the
Tcl interpreter as a parameter. Using the interpreter in self-interp is
unsafe because Python
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
tkinter.mainloop seems used in a bunch of places according to Google
Code. Am I missing something?
Yes, those
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Guilherme Polo rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org
wrote:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Eh.. old.
Anyway, I have made a patch against trunk now and it should work with
any nested level of cloned menus according to how tk names cloned menus.
--
nosy: +gpolo
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.0, Python 3.1 -Python
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
This is not going to happen.
You should be protecting it yourself since this is a special case.
--
nosy: +gpolo
resolution: - wont fix
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Closing as only r59654 was backported to release25-maint, so Tk 8.5 is
not fully supported by the standard Tkinter present in python 2.5.x
--
resolution: - wont fix
status: open - closed
___
Python
Changes by Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
--
title: IDLE doesn't work with Tk 8.5 - IDLE doesn't work with Tk 8.5 under
python 2.5 and older
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2693
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Can you retry making some small example that demonstrates the problem ?
--
nosy: +gpolo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2995
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Dropped for inclusion in python 2.5, but should still be considered for
trunk and py3k.
--
resolution: - accepted
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.0, Python 3.1 -Python 2.5
___
Python tracker rep
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Your example doesn't disprove the merely syntactic sugar found in the
documentation about the decorator syntax.
The results you are getting are based on when the decorator is applied.
--
nosy: +gpolo
resolution: - invalid
status: open
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Martin v. Löwis rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Notice that the example function doesn't actually work; it gives
_tkinter.TclError: wrong # args: should
Changes by Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3833
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Jimmy Retzlaff (msg73003):
I'm seeing the same symptoms that are described in issue 1543 with the
2.6b3 MSIs. Namely, when you run one of the MSIs (either 32-bit or
64-bit) then the other will refuse to install. This is on XP Pro x64 SP2
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Uhm ? The builtin cmp wasn't removed.
--
nosy: +gpolo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4760
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
I hope you are not too bored for me commenting on this again.
So, I have re-though about this issue today and decided to solve it
differently (and will include a patch here this time, don't worry about
mentions to external repo this time
Changes by Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file12427/keep_tclcommands_correct.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1524639
Changes by Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12430/keep_tclcommands_correct.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1524639
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
It isn't being careful when calling PyErr_SetFromErrno inside the
Py_UniversalNewlineFread function since this function is being called
all over fileobject after releasing the GIL.. so, isn't this just a
matter of adding pairs
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Martin v. Löwis rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
It isn't being careful when calling PyErr_SetFromErrno inside the
Py_UniversalNewlineFread function since
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
You don't need to cast PyObject_HashNotImplemented to hashfunc
--
nosy: +gpolo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4701
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Hagen Fürstenau rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Hagen Fürstenau hfuerste...@gmx.net added the comment:
Why does every other place seem to do the cast? Historical reasons?
No, if you look at the functions
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Hagen Fürstenau rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Hagen Fürstenau hfuerste...@gmx.net added the comment:
I'm talking about places like these:
[hag...@chage py3k]$ grep -R (hashfunc)PyObject_HashNotImplemented
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fix: My previous comment was about changes in Misc.deletecommand not
Misc.destroy (this is what you get for guessing the methods changed in
the diff, without applying it).
To Quentin: I wouldn't bother mentioning it since this new TkinterError
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Rethinking about the changes done in Misc._configure I found out that
you don't need any of those there.
Isn't it the case of only improving the changes regarding callable
overwriting in Misc._options ? So if the value is a callable
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
The changes in Misc.destroy do not look right, why are you deleting
commands created by bind_all (for example) from the root window when a
simple widget is destroyed ?
It would make more sense to not apply these changes in Misc.destroy
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
I've fixed the leaks in Variable doing this:
http://code.google.com/p/plumage/source/detail?r=93
I don't use an extra _tclCommands for Variable, instead in __del__ I use
the information returned by Variable.trace_vinfo to remove associated
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Guilherme Polo rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Rethinking about the changes done in Misc._configure I found out that
you don't need any of those there.
Isn't
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Something like the proposed patch is still needed. But allow me to point
out my views towards your current patch:
* Changes in Misc.after, Misc._bind: good
* Changes in Misc.unbind can be simplified a bit:
cbs = self._bind_names(self._bind
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sample attached for demonstrating the leak by missing a call to
Tkapp_CallDeallocArgs.
--
nosy: +gpolo
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12373/test_tkleak1.py
___
Python tracker rep
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Martin v. Löwis rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
What problem is solved by ScrolledText.diff that isn't already solved by
scrolledtext_masterstr.diff?
None
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Martin v. Löwis rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
I'm skeptical about backporting r59654. Doing so might break existing
applications.
I don't see in what
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Martin v. Löwis rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Can you remind me what problem was fixed with r59653? I can't find the
Tk tracker anymore on which
Guilherme Polo ggp...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Martin v. Löwis rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
I don't see in what way it would break existing applications. The
indices returned by that command in Tcl
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
priority: - release blocker
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4342
___
___
Python-bugs
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I've been working on a new _tkinter (named it as plumage) these days
and I hit this same problem for trusting too much that nothing from tcl,
including tk and extensions, would give me this embedded null.
Checking another bridge to Tcl (one
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This is indeed a problem with Tkinter only, but I didn't check what is
causing it yet.
For the suggestion about fixing the search method regarding the pattern:
the fix is almost fine, but we need to disallow None as a pattern
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Some more clarifications about this bug:
Tcl shouldn't be giving us a UTF-8 string with a 0xC0 byte, since that
is not valid UTF-8. I'm aware that Tcl uses the sequence 0xC0 0x80 for
special purposes but it is also said that such sequences
New submission from Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As was told in
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-November/083782.html
some objects may print a not so nice message when an attribute is not
found.
I considered this was due to Py_FindMethod being so easy to use
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
versions: -Python 3.0, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4475
___
___
Python
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Yes, it was a mistake to set the version for py3k too, that is why I
removed after noticing it.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4475
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Actually it should be commondialog.Dialog
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +gpolo
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12118/Directory_fix_subclass.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
It is important to commit this actually, since right now
tkinter.filedialog.Directory is pretty broken but also very simple to fix.
--
components: +Tkinter -Library (Lib)
type: compile error
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
There is a more general patch on issue4350 now
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue775309
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Disable it while running regrtest with -R ?
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +gpolo
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file12120/disable_testLoadTkFailure_in_regrtest.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I can reproduce this under windows vista with tk8.4 and tk8.5, but the
problem doesn't show up in Linux and it is not tkinter fault either.
--
nosy: +gpolo
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12121/issue1191726.py
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12122/test1.tcl
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1191726
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
You are missing the point on using Tcl_CreateObjCommand, I didn't mean
to just go and and do s/Tcl_CreateCommand/Tcl_CreateObjCommand/ because
if you are going to convert everything to unicode then there is no point
in using
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I'm sorry if it sounded like I were bashing you, I was just pointing out
my view of the patch -- you didn't need to remove it. The patch I
submitted here can also be improved (although it works), but I'm
leaving it as a possible idea
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Hirokazu Yamamoto added the comment:
You are missing the point on using Tcl_CreateObjCommand, I didn't mean
to just go and and do s/Tcl_CreateCommand/Tcl_CreateObjCommand/ because
if you are going to convert everything to unicode
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
issue4333 fixes this too, btw
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1447222
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
tk 8.4.19 here, but windows and linux almost surely uses different
window managers (you could run gnome and others under windows, but I'm
betting it is not the case).
Now, it is very hard to say that we shouldn't care about this bug here.
Tcl
New submission from Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I've added a new function called setup_master.
This function is responsible for returning an usable master to the
caller, or fail and say so. The function is useful for any wrapper
basically, since all them has to set up a master
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12041/applying_setup_master.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4343
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file12040/setup_master.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4343
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12042/setup_master.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4343
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I've noticed a problem with the previous patch, so this new one includes
a comment too so people can remember about the check being applied.
--
versions: +Python 2.5.3, Python 2.7
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12043
New submission from Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Implementing it makes this crazy check in
http://bugs.python.org/issue3767
(http://bugs.python.org/file12043/tkColorChooser.diff) be no longer needed
--
components: Tkinter
files: _tkinter__nonzero__.diff
keywords: patch
messages
New submission from Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why is PyObject_CallMethod resetting the exception message that is
already set (if an exception happened, that is) by PyObject_Getattr ?
--
components: Interpreter Core
files: abstract_dont_re_set_except_msg.diff
keywords: patch
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Why are you using update instead of update_idletasks ?
I'm not talking exactly about this line being added, but this ends up
calling TurtleScreenBase._update which calls self.cv.update(), cv being
a canvas. update_idletasks should be used
New submission from Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are some methods (which call tk commands) that no longer exist,
for a long time now so this patch remove them.
There are also these indices functions, which do not belong to the
module space and now are gone too.
--
files
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I can reproduce it here with tk8.4, using tk8.5 doesn't cause this.
--
nosy: +gpolo
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1028
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Here is a patch that doesn't use magic numbers :P
I didn't hit the problem described in issue4313 with this one, and
PythonCmd should be doing this anyway, but ideally we should move to
Tcl_CreateObjCommand.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file12053/PythonCmd_check_for_utf.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1028
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Removed some repeated code in the patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12054/PythonCmd_check_for_utf.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1028
New submission from Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please consider backporting r59653 and r59654 to release25-maint branch.
It may be of interest to backport r52688 too, also, r63776 together with
r63914 (without these last two I get segfault when passing a list as an
option value).
Finally
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
anyone ?
--
versions: +Python 2.5.3, Python 2.7, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3248
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I've changed it a bit more now, this includes dropping support for cnf.
My wish is to actually remove the cnf usage all over Tkinter :)
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12037/ScrolledText.diff
301 - 400 of 630 matches
Mail list logo
