[issue4342] (Tkinter) Please backport these

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: I have backported r59654 as r67737. As indicated, the other patches are not suitable for backporting. -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker __

[issue4342] (Tkinter) Please backport these

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > Are we talking about the same commit ? 59654 as in your original about > it breaking existing code. Oops, no. I now see that r59654 is fine for backporting. My last message was about r59653, which probably does introduce backward compatibility problems. The

[issue4342] (Tkinter) Please backport these

Guilherme Polo added the comment: On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > >> I don't see in what way it would break existing applications. The >> indices returned by that command in Tcl should all be represented as >> strings in Python,

[issue4342] (Tkinter) Please backport these

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > I don't see in what way it would break existing applications. The > indices returned by that command in Tcl should all be represented as > strings in Python, so I see this at max causing a double attempt to > convert it to str. I can't quite follow your term

[issue4342] (Tkinter) Please backport these

Guilherme Polo added the comment: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > > Can you remind me what problem was fixed with r59653? I can't find the > Tk tracker anymore on which this apparently was reported. > I had trouble finding it to

[issue4342] (Tkinter) Please backport these

Guilherme Polo added the comment: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > > I'm skeptical about backporting r59654. Doing so might break existing > applications. > I don't see in what way it would break existing applications. The indice

[issue4342] (Tkinter) Please backport these

Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Can you remind me what problem was fixed with r59653? I can't find the Tk tracker anymore on which this apparently was reported. If it fixes a problem with supporting Tcl 8.5, then I will also reject the request. Supporting Tcl 8.5 is a new

[issue4342] (Tkinter) Please backport these

Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I'm skeptical about backporting r59654. Doing so might break existing applications. -- nosy: +loewis ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _

[issue4342] (Tkinter) Please backport these

Changes by Guilherme Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- priority: -> release blocker ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ ___ Python-bu

[issue4342] (Tkinter) Please backport these

New submission from Guilherme Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Please consider backporting r59653 and r59654 to release25-maint branch. It may be of interest to backport r52688 too, also, r63776 together with r63914 (without these last two I get segfault when passing a list as an option value). Finall