Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here is a renewed patch against py3k, with a test.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20237/timet_64-2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8278
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
The patch looks still fine. The only concern is that the test probably fails on
FAT, but I think that's acceptable.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8278
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
The only concern is that the test probably fails on FAT
The patch does not show it, but I've put the test under a
'if get_file_system(support.TESTFN) == NTFS'
--
___
Python tracker
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
Committed r87666 (py3k), I'll backport to 3.1 and 2.7.
--
resolution: accepted - fixed
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8278
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
Merged into release31-maint (r87668) and release27-maint (r87669)
--
status: pending - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8278
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Amaury, Martin ack'ed the patch: is there something else you want to do?
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8278
New submission from Ramin Sabet ramin.sa...@gmail.com:
Error Message is:
OverflowError: long int too large to convert to int
---
Python Version:
Python 2.6.4 (r264:75708, Oct 26 2009, 08:23:19) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on
win32
---
Sample Code attached.
--
components: IO
files:
Changes by Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com:
--
nosy: +eric.smith
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8278
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Windows, time_t is 64bit, but various functions convert it to a 32bit long.
Attached patch uses time_t instead of long in various places, this fixes the
proposed test.
Martin, do you think it's a viable approach? If so, I'll go and
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
The patch looks fine to me, please apply.
--
resolution: - accepted
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8278
___
10 matches
Mail list logo