On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:24 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> Has any progress been made on an electronically signable agreement
> and/or adding "posting a patch to this tracker means you have the right
> to contribute it and you do contribute it" language to the tracker?
Note that the latter point (r
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:42:27 -0500, Steve Holden wrote:
> OK. As far as I am concerned, adding code to the repository that is
> not covered by a contributor agreement is a recipe for disaster, and I
> would like to hear what other committers think. I'm not sure how or
> when the committers list wa
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Ross Logerwall has been contributing patches for several months (both
>> bug fixes and new features). 28 changesets bear his name. I would like
>> to propose him as a co
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 13:08:53 -0800, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article <1299400922.3699.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>,
> Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > Ross Logerwall has been contributing patches for several months (both
> > bug fixes and new features). 28 changesets bear his name. I would like
> > to p
In article <1299400922.3699.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>,
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Ross Logerwall has been contributing patches for several months (both
> bug fixes and new features). 28 changesets bear his name. I would like
> to propose him as a committer (is this still the appropriate word?).
On Mar 6, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>>> Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 13:19 -0500, Steve Holden a écrit :
In short, if someone isn't able to sign a contributor agreement we
should ask ourselves whether it's really appropriate to incorporate
their contributions into th
Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 10:40 -0500, Steve Holden a écrit :
> People who have not signed a contributor agreement should not be
> listed as code authors: this leads to non-auditable contributions and
> a lack of clarity as to intellectual property ownership that can have
> negative consequences.
People who have not signed a contributor agreement should not be listed as code
authors: this leads to non-auditable contributions and a lack of clarity as to
intellectual property ownership that can have negative consequences. If you
want to make someone an author, confirm they are contributors
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:23, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> If I use hg commit --user, is it possible to see somewhere that the
>> commiter was me?
>
> Basically, no. If you want to honor contributors, put their name into
> the commit message.
You can still see who pushed it in the python-checkins emai
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Ross Logerwall has been contributing patches for several months (both
> bug fixes and new features). 28 changesets bear his name. I would like
> to propose him as a committer (is this still the appropriate word?).
I suspect that
On 06.03.2011 10:55, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do sometimes commit patches written by someone else. I tried to always
> add him/her to Misc/ACKS and in the changelog entry (Misc/NEWS). With
> git, it's possible to record an author different than the commiter. In
> Mercurial, I see a --user
Hi,
I do sometimes commit patches written by someone else. I tried to always
add him/her to Misc/ACKS and in the changelog entry (Misc/NEWS). With
git, it's possible to record an author different than the commiter. In
Mercurial, I see a --user option.
Can I use this option to commit a patch writt
Hello,
Ross Logerwall has been contributing patches for several months (both
bug fixes and new features). 28 changesets bear his name. I would like
to propose him as a committer (is this still the appropriate word?).
Regards
Antoine.
___
python-comm
13 matches
Mail list logo
