Am 24.10.2013 um 12:39 schrieb Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
With PEP 453 accepted, could Donald please be upgraded to full
committer access for ensurepip maintenance (the initial PEP 453
commits will still go through review on the tracker). (His SSH key is
already on file for PEP
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
With PEP 453 accepted, could Donald please be upgraded to full
committer access for ensurepip maintenance (the initial PEP 453
commits will still go through review on the tracker). (His SSH key is
already on file for PEP
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
With PEP 453 accepted, could Donald please be upgraded to full
committer access for ensurepip maintenance (the initial PEP 453
commits will still go through review on the tracker). (His SSH key is
already on file for PEP
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:12:07 -0400, Brett Cannon br...@yvrsfo.ca wrote:
FYI if you didn't know
You mean disk space? I don't get notified automatically when /tmp fills
up with test detritus. I suppose I should set something up.
However, it looks like someone has added some tests that use more
On 2013-10-24 16:59, R. David Murray wrote:
However, it looks like someone has added some tests that use more tmp
space,
since the amount of /tmp that exist has been fine up until this point,
and the runs on 2.7 and 3.3 are still working.
I can increase /tmp, but I wonder if there is a new
dstufft
On Oct 24, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
With PEP 453 accepted, could Donald please be upgraded to full
committer access for ensurepip maintenance (the initial PEP 453
commits will
Changes made to bugs.python.org
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
dstufft
On Oct 24, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
With PEP 453 accepted, could Donald
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:08:11 +0200, Antoine Pitrou anto...@python.org wrote:
On 2013-10-24 16:59, R. David Murray wrote:
However, it looks like someone has added some tests that use more tmp
space,
since the amount of /tmp that exist has been fine up until this point,
and the runs on
