On 01/25/2014 05:35 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Stop the Derby. We needn't convert everything for 3.4 (I didn't even
know that was your goal).
Converting everything was my goal at one point. At this point it is
nowhere near viable, not the least because there simply isn't enough
time. As
Interesting. Chromium has something kind-of similar, named commit queue,
for developers without actual commit access. Once they get an LGTM, the
thing rolls automatically. In fact, core developers often find it useful
too because the Chromium tree is sometimes closed (red). We don't really
do the
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 05:49:56 -0800, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
do the latter in Python, which carries a problem we'll probably need to
resolve first - how to know that the bots are green enough. That really
needs human attention.
By that needs human attention, do you mean: dealing
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting. Chromium has something kind-of similar, named commit queue,
for developers without actual commit access. Once they get an LGTM, the
thing rolls automatically. In fact, core developers often find it useful too
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 06:35:59 -0800, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:14 AM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.comwrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 05:49:56 -0800, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com
wrote:
do the latter in Python, which carries a problem we'll probably
On Jan 25, 2014, at 10:09 AM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 06:35:59 -0800, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:14 AM, R. David Murray
rdmur...@bitdance.comwrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 05:49:56 -0800, Eli Bendersky
On dim., 2014-01-26 at 01:40 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I think an extra beta is still a good idea, though - I'd like to get
at least the builtins that are already supported converted, since that
clearly demonstrates the benefits the tool is designed to bring in
reducing the discrepancies
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:13 AM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.comwrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 06:59:19 -0800, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Eli Bendersky
On sam., 2014-01-25 at 17:14 +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On dim., 2014-01-26 at 01:40 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I think an extra beta is still a good idea, though - I'd like to get
at least the builtins that are already supported converted, since that
clearly demonstrates the benefits the
On sam., 2014-01-25 at 06:35 -0800, Eli Bendersky wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:14 AM, R. David Murray
rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 05:49:56 -0800, Eli Bendersky
eli...@gmail.com wrote:
do the latter in Python, which carries a problem we'll
On 25/01/14 19:33, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 01/25/2014 07:40 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Basically, I suggest implementing the current bug fixes minor
features AC patch you're working on, and then calling it done
for 3.4, with only outright bugs in existing conversions to be
fixed before 3.5.
On 1/25/2014 2:55 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On sam., 2014-01-25 at 06:35 -0800, Eli Bendersky wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:14 AM, R. David Murray
rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 05:49:56 -0800, Eli Bendersky
eli...@gmail.com wrote:
do the latter
On 1/25/2014 9:54 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting. Chromium has something kind-of similar, named commit queue,
for developers without actual commit access. Once they get an LGTM, the
thing rolls automatically. In
13 matches
Mail list logo
