On 1/30/2016 3:39 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Me too, but only if you add a PendingDeprecationWarning to
PendingDeprecationWarning .
There were some discussions a while back of restoring a distinction
between the two by having code executed directly at the REPL (whether
at the command line or in I
On 30 January 2016 at 13:28, Martin Panter wrote:
> On 29 January 2016 at 21:59, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>> On 29.01.16 21:56, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Serhiy Storchaka
>>> wrote:
Some deprecation can be documentation-only.
>>>
>>> Do you have examples where
On 30 January 2016 at 09:39, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2016, at 06:11 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>>+1 from me as well, especially once Serhiy's comments are addressed.
Likewise - an additional proofreading pass would be useful, but the
overall content looks fine to me.
> Me too, but only i
