[python-committers] Re: [IMPORTANT] Preparations for 3.11.0 beta 1

On 08. 04. 22 9:51, Inada Naoki wrote: Thank you, Victor. I had considered dropping (a) from the PEP. But I keep them because: * I rushed to write PEP, before 3.11 beta. * In the "Backward compatibility" section in the PEP, I want to mention `locale.getencoding()` and `encoding="locale"` * But

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 8:32 PM Brett Cannon wrote: > > Thanks to Petr, and Victor, the platforms that are still looking for a total > of two maintainers over at https://github.com/python/peps/pull/2442/files are: > > arch64-apple-darwin clang > aarch64-linux-gnu glibc, clang (Victor is already l

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On 25. 03. 22 11:43, Victor Stinner wrote: You wrote that you want at least 2 core devs responsible for each tier 1 platform. I didn't understand if this requirement is also for Tier 2. Who are these core devs? Is there a list? The list will be in the PEP. Add yourself at https://github.com/p

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On 11. 03. 22 19:30, Brett Cannon wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 1:26 AM Petr Viktorin <mailto:encu...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 11. 03. 22 0:35, Brett Cannon wrote: > I brought this up on python-dev at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-...@py

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On 11. 03. 22 0:35, Brett Cannon wrote: I brought this up on python-dev at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-...@python.org/thread/ZPBSHENP3V7KHNPYWE6BEQD5ASES2NLV/ , and the feedba

[python-committers] Re: list of core-devs, triagers, etc.

On 17. 02. 22 20:05, Ethan Furman wrote: On 2/17/22 10:47 AM, Senthil Kumaran wrote: > If the utility value of the list has faded way, archiving the list, and pointing the subgroup to > other active places seems like better idea to me. The list is useful, just for a very small set of people

[python-committers] Re: list of core-devs, triagers, etc.

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 4:16 AM Ethan Furman wrote: > > Greetings! > > Is there a list somewhere of the core developers and triagers? > > I'm looking to prune the core-mentorship subscriber list as I'm confident > 90%+ are folks that wanted help learning > Python, not folks wanting help to develo

[python-committers] Re: Python 3.11.0a4 is blocked

https://bugs.python.org/issue46006 This one is due to a regression made in bpo-40521 "Make free lists and unicode caches per-interpreter". It affects 3.10 as well, and hes broken a number of third-party libraries there (e.g. mod_wsgi and kodi). It's not

[python-committers] Re: status of smtpd

On 23. 06. 21 15:21, Irit Katriel via python-committers wrote: On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:58 PM Joannah Nanjekye mailto:nanjekyejoan...@gmail.com>> wrote: Am not against removing dead batteries but Am still very skeptical and disturbed about how the decision to remove modules is m

[python-committers] Re: IMPORTANT: Python 3.10b2 release blockers

On 28. 05. 21 6:55, Tim Peters wrote: [Pablo] Tim, check this out: import re, gc x = re.compile("x") gc.get_referents(x.__class__)[-1] Cool! So presumably this constructs a cycle involving a pattern object: import re p = re.compile("ab*c") import _sre _sre.WOWZA = p Indeed, under the cur

[python-committers] Re: Publish better than md5sums of Python builds?

On 16. 03. 21 21:16, Gregory P. Smith wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 9:42 AM Christian Heimes > wrote: On 16/03/2021 16.54, Julien Palard wrote: > Le 2021-03-16 à 15:52, Christian Heimes a écrit : >> could you please explain your use case? Which problem

[python-committers] Re: Please avoid non-bugfix changes during the beta phase

On 2020-07-07 21:35, Barry Warsaw wrote: It’s true that as releases get closer to final, more people will start exercising them. However, you really don’t have to wait. I maintain “official” Linux (Ubuntu) Docker images that contain all the latest releases (including alphas and betas), and t

Re: [python-committers] [Python-Dev] 3.7.2rc1 and 3.6.8rc1 cutoffs ahead, last 3.6.x bugfix release!

though. Pursuing the project would also need credible commitments from redistributors to actually adopt the variant - the technical design in the README is explicitly constructed so it would work as a drop-in replacement for the RHEL 8 system Python, but at the time I left RH, Petr Viktorin and I did

Re: [python-committers] Python 4.0 or Python 3.10?

On 9/25/18 9:30 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote: What's the current plan for what version of Python we release after 3.9? The reason I'm asking this is because I frequently need to refer to *that version* of Python in the documentation, especially when I'm deprecating APIs or behavior. Right now I'm s

Re: [python-committers] Automerge bot deployed

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 23:30 Victor Stinner wrote: > Today I created a PR with a description containing "type.__format__()". To > display it properly, I chose to edit the description and write > "type.\_\_format\_\_()". I guess that the bot will merge a description like > that unchanged, right? So