+1
If someone can tell me how to configure discourse to work like a
mailing list; specifically:
- email me messsages rather than 'X new messages" nuisance-mails
- work sanely with replies-from-mail
then I'm certainly happy to adapt.
-Rob
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 at 13:19, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>
So, I'm fine with this, but FWIW I'm also fine with anything we come
up with: I trust us, our intentions individually and in aggregate, and
I can't imagine a poor outcome.
-Rob
On 19 July 2018 at 14:36, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> [tl;dr: We need some ground rules, because uncertainty makes it hard
On Fri., 13 Jul. 2018, 02:58 Guido van Rossum, wrote:
> available. But I'm basically giving myself a permanent vacation from being
> BDFL, and you all will be on your own.
>
Thank you for being here, benevolent, for so long . You've been a great
example in our communities and it is much apprecia
I'd very much like the feature, but not sure that the proposed change
is a good fit today.
-Rob
On 2 May 2018 at 22:13, Victor Stinner wrote:
> 2018-05-02 11:56 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore :
>> On 2 May 2018 at 10:49, Victor Stinner wrote:
>>> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "
Folk can't argue with robots: I think its useful to have an escape
valve for dealing with spurious failures - the Python Core team is
pretty responsible, and I think we should permit bypassing robots, at
least until we have lots of run-time to learn about any flakiness
present.
-Rob
On 16 June 20
le are either happy with this approach or will begrudgingly accept it.
Clearly I should join the core-workflow list.
Has anyone put forward the 'standard' solution other projects use: to
extract NEWS entries from commit logs?
-Rob
--
Rober
On 30 July 2015 at 05:20, Eric Snow wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2015 11:08 AM, "Robert Collins"
> wrote:
>>
>> On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> > The more recent Python 2.7 bugfix releases have
>> > specific exemptions
On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening the
> requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
> vulnerabilities. I think you can find more by Googling for keywords like
> "http header injection". Th
On 22 July 2015 at 08:07, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 22 July 2015 at 05:08, Larry Hastings wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/21/2015 06:35 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>>
>> Cool. http://bugs.python.org/issue21750 is in a bad state right now.
>>
>> I landed a pat
On 22 July 2015 at 05:08, Larry Hastings wrote:
>
>
> On 07/21/2015 06:35 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Cool. http://bugs.python.org/issue21750 is in a bad state right now.
>
> I landed a patch to fix it, which when exposed to users had some
> defects. I'm working on
hon.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/robertc%40robertcollins.net
>
--
Robert Collins
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud
___
python-comm
I'm happy to provide on demand reviews. I an take on the backporting easily
enough.
On 27 Jun 2015 4:47 pm, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> My available time for the fundamentals of stdlib module maintenance is
> unfortunately pretty limited these days, which means even reviewed
> patches f
12 matches
Mail list logo
