On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
..
> Ok, I've found a later message:
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-August/090959.html
>
This post precedes the creation of py3k-datetime branch, so no wonder
that it was not mentioned. I wonder, though why sandbox was no
Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 18:25 -0400, Alexander Belopolsky a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> ..
> > A quick search found the following message by Dirkjan, but it is likely
> > earlier messages on the subject had been posted too:
> > http://mail.python.org/piperma
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
..
> A quick search found the following message by Dirkjan, but it is likely
> earlier messages on the subject had been posted too:
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-July/090325.html
>
No wonder I missed that. I assume you a
> Regardless, since Alexander's previous work was in the sandbox repo (not
> the python repo), I don't think it would have been possible to integrate
> it during the hg migration.
See the message I just sent - it's *not* a separate repository (else
subversion would not be able to reconstruct the f
> It looks like this history survived the cvs to svn migration, but was
> lost in migration to hg.
It's not there anymore, but it isn't lost, either - you can still get it
from svn if you want to (and should still be able to do so twenty years
from now if you care - just as you can still get the o
Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 17:43 -0400, R. David Murray a écrit :
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:00:21 -0400, Alexander Belopolsky
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > ..
> > > All mainline history has been kept, as well as "active" feature branches
> > > (feature bran
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:00:21 -0400, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> ..
> > All mainline history has been kept, as well as "active" feature branches
> > (feature branches someone asked to be kept) (*). I don't know if
> > Alexander's changese
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
..
> All mainline history has been kept, as well as "active" feature branches
> (feature branches someone asked to be kept) (*). I don't know if
> Alexander's changesets are part of that, since he didn't precise where
> they were made in the S
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> Can you be more precise? How did you do that?
>
> See the example that he gave, e.g. r82065. The changes are in
> /sandbox/branches/py3k-datetime.
Martin mostly answered Antoine's question for me.You can get more
details by comparin
On Apr 25, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I propose that the redirector (hg.../lookup) redirects to the subversion
> viewer if it can't find a matching hg revision.
That sounds like an extremely user-friendly solution.
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden
st...@holdenweb.com
_
On Apr 25, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 14:29 -0400, Steve Holden a écrit :
>>
>> Great advice for the future, Antoine. Now can you help with the Hg
>> issue?
>
> As far as I understand it, this is not so much an hg issue than a
> migration issue.
>
>> I ha
> Can you be more precise? How did you do that?
See the example that he gave, e.g. r82065. The changes are in
/sandbox/branches/py3k-datetime.
>> However, hg log of this file starts with my commit about a year ago.
>> Is it possible to re-add the old history?
>
> We cannot "add" any past history
Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 14:29 -0400, Steve Holden a écrit :
>
> Great advice for the future, Antoine. Now can you help with the Hg
> issue?
As far as I understand it, this is not so much an hg issue than a
migration issue.
> I had understood that *all* history was going to be retained. Did I
>
On Apr 25, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> The history of datetime.py
>> is very helpful for understanding various design decisions implemented
>> in that module.
>
> I would advise to document design decisions in source code comments or
> in a separate file. Having to dig in VCS logs,
Sorry, reply initially sent off-list.
Message transféré
De: Antoine Pitrou
À: Alexander Belopolsky
Sujet: Re: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:58:50 +0200
> When I committed Lib/datetime.py to svn, I made sure that it
I am not sure where to report such issues, so I'll post it here.
Please advise if another list is more appropriate.
When I committed Lib/datetime.py to svn, I made sure that it was done
in a way that preserved the history of that file going back to 2002.
However, hg log of this file starts with my
16 matches
Mail list logo
