I just sent the email an hour ago and have not heard anything from him as
of yet.
On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 at 09:55 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> How did he react to the whole thing? Did he give signs of wanting to
> improve his behaviour?
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 02/06/2017 à 18:47, Brett Canno
How did he react to the whole thing? Did he give signs of wanting to
improve his behaviour?
Regards
Antoine.
Le 02/06/2017 à 18:47, Brett Cannon a écrit :
> I just wanted to quickly let people know I lifted Wes' two-month ban and
> emailed him to notify him of the lifting.
>
> On Fri, 31 Mar
I just wanted to quickly let people know I lifted Wes' two-month ban and
emailed him to notify him of the lifting.
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 at 14:40 Brett Cannon wrote:
> In the (long) discussion of
> https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/6, Wes Turner began to do
> his usual posting of list
On Sat, 01 Apr 2017 15:08:27 -0400, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> I'll be another voice saying that the CoC isn't the right mechanism -- the
> CoC is for harassment and abuse (at least, most community's CoCs are, the
> Python one is pretty vague).
>
> That said, I have no problem with the action taken, ba
On 1 April 2017 at 19:35, Brett Cannon wrote:
> From what people have said in opposition to what I did, I think we need to
> have a discussion about two things:
>
> 1. Is it a CoC violation if someone chooses to ignore repeated warnings that
> their communication style is unproductive and thus a w
I'll be another voice saying that the CoC isn't the right mechanism -- the
CoC is for harassment and abuse (at least, most community's CoCs are, the
Python one is pretty vague).
That said, I have no problem with the action taken, banning people who are
extremely unproductive is a necessary step fo
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 09:27 M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 01.04.2017 05:44, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 31, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >>
> >> In the (long) discussion of
> https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/6, Wes Turner began to do
> his usual posting of lists
On 1 April 2017 at 18:59, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> In this particular case, we're only at step 2 - self-moderation based
> on previously provided guidance has proven inadequate, so an enforced
> break specifically from the Python org on GitHub makes sense (mainly
> because the tools for dealing with
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 9:27 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> It's the ultimate tool, not the first to consider.
I am with this approach too. Defining a process and gradually
enforcing CoC through a well-defined process seems to be way to go.
Reading Brett's first email, it appears that it was followe
On 1 April 2017 at 19:16, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 1 April 2017 at 09:17, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> I have sometimes been mildly annoyed by his posting style on MLs, and I
>> can imagine how it can become very annoying on a GitHub PR.
>
> Agreed. I don't feel that Wes' contributions are productive,
On 04/01/2017 02:16 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 1 April 2017 at 09:17, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
But even if that *is* the case, there
comes a point where treating all participants equally does mean we're
OK to say "sorry, you're being unproductive and that won't change, so
we can't work with you" re
On 01.04.2017 05:44, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
>> On Mar 31, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>
>> In the (long) discussion of
>> https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/6, Wes Turner began to do his
>> usual posting of lists. People pointed out he was stepping out of line by
>>
On 1 April 2017 at 09:17, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I have sometimes been mildly annoyed by his posting style on MLs, and I
> can imagine how it can become very annoying on a GitHub PR.
Agreed. I don't feel that Wes' contributions are productive, and I
generally ignore them. I support banning him i
Le 01/04/2017 à 05:44, Raymond Hettinger a écrit :
>
> FWIW, this may just be his communication style that reflects his
tooling (probably emacs org-mode or some such) and his way of thinking
about problems.
It is most probably his communication style, as I have seen him act this
way on other mai
> On Mar 31, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> In the (long) discussion of https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/6,
> Wes Turner began to do his usual posting of lists. People pointed out he was
> stepping out of line by being somewhat off-topic and seemingly lecturing
> folk
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> In the (long) discussion of
> https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/6, Wes Turner began to do his
> usual posting of lists. People pointed out he was stepping out of line by
> being somewhat off-topic and seemingly lecturing folks. He
In the (long) discussion of https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/6,
Wes Turner began to do his usual posting of lists. People pointed out he
was stepping out of line by being somewhat off-topic and seemingly
lecturing folks. He posted some of his lists again and then I warned him
that if
17 matches
Mail list logo
