On 07/18/2017 02:36 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Can I take the opportunity to say thank you again (both you and Larry)
for the "blurb" tool? It really makes an important difference when
contributing.
On 07/18/2017 03:24 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Thank you Larry Hastings, Brett Cannon and othe
Ah, how deservedly superficial my title is:
% python3 flufl.py
File "flufl.py", line 3
1 <> 2
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
% cat flufl.py
from __future__ import barry_as_FLUFL
1 <> 2
-Barry
> On Jul 19, 2017, at 11:31, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> 2017-07-19 17:23 GMT+02:00 Barry W
2017-07-19 17:23 GMT+02:00 Barry Warsaw :
> That, and bringing back the diamond operator for realz.
For people who don't know the "diamond operator" like me ;-)
haypo@selma$ python3
Python 3.5.3 (default, May 10 2017, 15:05:55)
>>> from __future__ import barry_as_FLUFL
>>> 1 != 2
SyntaxError: inv
On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:01 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>It's very obvious, Barry, that you're playing the long game of trying to
>line up GitLab as the next platform once we grow tired of GitHub and need
>to switch in a few years. I'm on to you. ;)
That, and bringing back the diamond operator for real
> > 2. Bot to backport PRs (which could also be automatically merged)
> So, to me, this is the priority item on the list.
I'm planning to work on the cherry-pick bot this during the core sprint in
September. Unless someone beat me to it.
Automatically close stale PRs (e.g. not signing CLA, cha
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 at 16:06 Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/18/2017 2:31 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > Once again, glad the goals are panning out. :) Key thing has always been
> > to increase our bandwidth and part of that was always to push more on to
> > contributors so they can be more self-servici
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 at 12:54 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 15:21, R. David Murray wrote:
> >
> > I much prefer rietveld over github reviews, but I also much prefer the
> > integration between the bug tracker and github over the minimal
> > integration we had for rietveld. Thanks to
On 7/18/2017 2:31 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Once again, glad the goals are panning out. :) Key thing has always been
to increase our bandwidth and part of that was always to push more on to
contributors so they can be more self-servicing.
* most contributors create backports (using cherry-
On Jul 18, 2017, at 15:21, R. David Murray wrote:
>
> I much prefer rietveld over github reviews, but I also much prefer the
> integration between the bug tracker and github over the minimal
> integration we had for rietveld. Thanks to all the people who made
> that happen, and especially Brett
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:24:13 +0200, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> I'm just not unconfortable with the fact that an approval is kept even
> if the PR is modified after the review :-/ I would expect a list a
> notice "changed modified after the review" or something like that. At
> least, for my own revie
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 at 03:24 Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2017-07-18 11:36 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou :
> > Can I take the opportunity to say thank you again (both you and Larry)
> > for the "blurb" tool? It really makes an important difference when
> > contributing.
>
Glad it's working out! A
18.07.17 14:40, Antoine Pitrou пише:
Assuming you meant Martin von Löwis, I think Martin stopped contributing
long before we migrated to git (unfortunately, I might add). I hope
he's doing ok.
I meant Martin Panter. His was the third of most active committers
recent two years, but didn't comm
On 18 July 2017 at 21:36, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> I rather like the new workflow (except few lost features), but I afraid than
> many core developers are feeling uncomfortable with it.
Aye, I think for folks already familiar with git and PR-style
workflows through other projects, it's been almo
Le 18/07/2017 à 13:36, Serhiy Storchaka a écrit :
>
> I have a different impression. Some core developers (like Raymond or
> Martin) stopped committing even if they are active on the bug tracker or
> mailing lists. Others make much less commits than they did before the
> migration.
Assuming y
18.07.17 13:24, Victor Stinner пише:
== More contributors, more contributions, faster reviewed/merged ==
In term of contributions, I looked at statistics yesterday and it
became clear the number of different authors is significantely much
higher, around 25 contributors / month before, now closer
Hi,
2017-07-18 11:36 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou :
> Can I take the opportunity to say thank you again (both you and Larry)
> for the "blurb" tool? It really makes an important difference when
> contributing.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
I concur with Antoine, I'm now *very* happy with the new workflow
16 matches
Mail list logo
