On 03/31/2013 06:27 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Georg Brandl gmx.net> writes:
>
>> with 3.2.4 being the last regular 3.2 maintenance release and the rc out
>> of the door, the 3.2 branch should only be committed to for security
>> releases. So please don't commit anything there anymore. To help ev
Georg Brandl gmx.net> writes:
> with 3.2.4 being the last regular 3.2 maintenance release and the rc out
> of the door, the 3.2 branch should only be committed to for security
> releases. So please don't commit anything there anymore. To help everyone
> remember, I've configured the push hook t
On Mar 30, 2013, at 06:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>Or 2.6?
Right, but no one should really be committing to 2.6 without at least checking
with me first. FWIW, I still merge from 2.6 to 2.7 if appropriate, but given
that there's only one more 2.6 release planned at all, this is a very rare
occu
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:13:13 -0700, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article <20130330141534.44893250...@webabinitio.net>,
> "R. David Murray" wrote:
> > This is the first time we've been in the situation of having a
> > security-only branch in Mercurial (other than 2.7, which is its own head).
>
> 3.1?
On 3/30/2013 1:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
I also don't know what "which is its own head" is supposed to mean :-)
We don't merge 2.7 into default, leaving 2.7 as a second head.
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://m
On 03/30/2013 06:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le samedi 30 mars 2013 à 10:13 -0700, Ned Deily a écrit :
>> In article <20130330141534.44893250...@webabinitio.net>,
>> "R. David Murray" wrote:
>> > This is the first time we've been in the situation of having a
>> > security-only branch in Mercur
Le samedi 30 mars 2013 à 10:13 -0700, Ned Deily a écrit :
> In article <20130330141534.44893250...@webabinitio.net>,
> "R. David Murray" wrote:
> > This is the first time we've been in the situation of having a
> > security-only branch in Mercurial (other than 2.7, which is its own head).
>
> 3.
In article <20130330141534.44893250...@webabinitio.net>,
"R. David Murray" wrote:
> This is the first time we've been in the situation of having a
> security-only branch in Mercurial (other than 2.7, which is its own head).
3.1?
--
Ned Deily,
n...@acm.org
___
On 03/30/2013 04:20 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> On 30/03/13 16:10, Jesus Cea wrote:
>> Something simple would be for the hook to refuse any commit in
>> that branch UNLESS it is coming from the maintainer.
>
> BTW, are the hooks available anywhere. I am interested in the "create
> patch" hook and the "
On 03/30/2013 04:10 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> On 30/03/13 15:15, R. David Murray wrote:
>> This is the first time we've been in the situation of having a
>> security-only branch in Mercurial (other than 2.7, which is its own
>> head). So I don't believe we have articulated a procedure yet.
>
> I am a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/03/13 16:10, Jesus Cea wrote:
> Something simple would be for the hook to refuse any commit in
> that branch UNLESS it is coming from the maintainer.
BTW, are the hooks available anywhere. I am interested in the "create
patch" hook and the "be s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/03/13 15:15, R. David Murray wrote:
> This is the first time we've been in the situation of having a
> security-only branch in Mercurial (other than 2.7, which is its own
> head). So I don't believe we have articulated a procedure yet.
I am ask
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:41:39 +0100, Jesus Cea wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 28/03/13 08:55, Georg Brandl wrote:
> > with 3.2.4 being the last regular 3.2 maintenance release and the
> > rc out of the door, the 3.2 branch should only be committed to for
> > securi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/03/13 08:55, Georg Brandl wrote:
> with 3.2.4 being the last regular 3.2 maintenance release and the
> rc out of the door, the 3.2 branch should only be committed to for
> security releases. So please don't commit anything there anymore.
> To he
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with 3.2.4 being the last regular 3.2 maintenance release and the rc out
> of the door, the 3.2 branch should only be committed to for security
> releases. So please don't commit anything there anymore. To help everyone
> remembe
Hi all,
with 3.2.4 being the last regular 3.2 maintenance release and the rc out
of the door, the 3.2 branch should only be committed to for security
releases. So please don't commit anything there anymore. To help everyone
remember, I've configured the push hook to reject changesets to the 3.2
16 matches
Mail list logo
