RE: Core vote for 3.3.1 stable release

2007-02-02 Thread Martijn Moeling
+1 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Graham Dumpleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:35 PM Aan: Jim Gallacher CC: python-dev list Onderwerp: Re: Core vote for 3.3.1 stable release Jim Gallacher wrote .. > I think we have sufficiently tested 3.3.1 and it i

RE: mod_python 3.3.1 available for testing

2007-02-01 Thread Martijn Moeling
+1 Linux Fedora Core 4 i386, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.5 +1 Linux CentOS i686, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.5 Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jim Gallacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: Thursday, February 01, 2007 16:15 Aan: python-dev list Onderwerp: Re

RE: [mod_python] ANNOUNCE: Mod_python 3.3.0b (Beta)

2006-12-29 Thread Martijn Moeling
I have been testing with this version for some time no And as far as I can see this version is the most stable, reliable and memory leak free version of mod_python I have seen so far. The new importer makes development much better since you do not have to restart Apache for every module change.

3.3.0b tested on FC4, Py2.5

2006-12-19 Thread Martijn Moeling
Hi, I just installed: Python 2.5 (with the usual TCL trouble for IDLE to work) Mod_python 3.3.0b So: +1 Linux Fedora Core 4 i386, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.5 I found no problems with my application, It is running on a SEMI production machine with +/- 10.000 hits a day. (Actually i

RE: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]

2006-12-14 Thread Martijn Moeling
I will test on my fedora core 4 system, but I'll have to dig into the changes made in the importer, I already know I am going to need the new importer but I'm not sure what is going to happen. I assemble python modules from database records which are to be newly imported when changed, 3.3.0 will b