Re: release 3.2.10?

2006-07-18 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
I'm +1 on going for 3.2.10. You in Canada probably have it easier - I think we hit 96F/35C at some point today or yesterday (I wouldn't know I'm in the office which has AC sunrise to sunset, I just listen to the news), and unfortunately (or not) due to work pressures I have no time for

Re: release 3.2.10?

2006-07-18 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: For 3.2.9 I called for 2 rounds of testing: one for the release candidate and one for the final tarball. Do folks here feel that is necessary for 3.2.10 or should I just jump right to the 3.2.10 final? That tarball would still be subject to a vote on

Re: release 3.2.10?

2006-07-18 Thread Jorey Bump
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: (we'll just have to make a 3.2.11 then). Let's call that one the Spinal Tap version. :)

release 3.2.10?

2006-07-16 Thread Jim Gallacher
Shall we proceed with a 3.2.10 release with the current memory leak fixes, or keep digging for more leaks? Seeing as it's summer for most of us (except for Graham), I get the feeling people don't have a lot of free time to spend on mod_python right now. Personally I think we should release 3.2.10

release 3.2.10?

2006-07-16 Thread Graham Dumpleton
it is winter down here and I'm freezing my butt off doesn't mean I am any less busy. :-( Personally I think we should release 3.2.10 now and make a concerted effort to do a code review before a 3.3 release in October / November. I agree we should just get the 3.2.10 release out. We are still

Re: release 3.2.10?

2006-07-16 Thread Jim Gallacher
Graham Dumpleton wrote: Jim Gallacher wrote .. Shall we proceed with a 3.2.10 release with the current memory leak fixes, or keep digging for more leaks? Seeing as it's summer for most of us (except for Graham), I get the feeling people don't have a lot of free time to spend on mod_python