Re: Segfaults in ConnectionHander (Possible Solution)

2006-01-31 Thread Volodya
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:40:39PM -0500, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > Graham Dumpleton wrote .. > > Extending the above code as: > > > > Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS; > > rc = ap_get_brigade(c->input_filters, bb, mode, APR_BLOCK_READ, > > bufsize); > > Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS; > > > > if (!

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-102) Bus error with connection handler on secondary port.

2006-01-31 Thread Graham Dumpleton (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-102?page=comments#action_12364549 ] Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-102: After much digging, documented at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01062.html http:

Re: Segfaults in ConnectionHander (Possible Solution)

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher
Volodya wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:40:39PM -0500, Graham Dumpleton wrote: Graham Dumpleton wrote .. Extending the above code as: Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS; rc = ap_get_brigade(c->input_filters, bb, mode, APR_BLOCK_READ, bufsize); Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS; if (! APR_STATUS_IS_SUC

Re: Segfaults in ConnectionHander (Possible Solution)

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher
Jim Gallacher wrote: Volodya wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:40:39PM -0500, Graham Dumpleton wrote: Graham Dumpleton wrote .. Extending the above code as: Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS; rc = ap_get_brigade(c->input_filters, bb, mode, APR_BLOCK_READ, bufsize); Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS;

Re: 3.2.6 test period - how long do we wait?

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher
I assume we will be doing a 3.2.7 release if Graham's fix for the ConnectionHandler / MODPYTHON-102 problem works? If that is the case I wonder if we should roll in the changes to support apache 2.2. I scanned mod_python for deprecated or removed apr calls and can find only one (apr_sockaddr_p

Re: 3.2.6 test period - how long do we wait?

2006-01-31 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
OK, so shall we schedule the 3.2.x release for 2007, then ? As for the Apache 2.2 version, what if we roll in your suggested patch, Jim, then discover a bunch of problem related to it during the beta tests ? Will we wait until they are all fixed to release the 3.2 version ? Apache 2.2 is quite new

Re: 3.2.6 test period - how long do we wait?

2006-01-31 Thread Rob Sanderson
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 17:59 +0100, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: > Once again, it seems that no regression have been introduced in 3.2.6 > vs 3.1.4, so we should release it ASAP and try to keep a steady > release rythm afterwards. When we'll get momentum we'll solve a bunch > of problem pretty fast, but i

Fwd: Contact request from Nokia Opensource / Research site user.

2006-01-31 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
FYI, Johan Wikman from Nokia answered my request. He's OK for us to brag about mod_python 3.1.3 running on the Nokia S60 platform, though he doesn't want to be quoted directly. The fun part is that he'd like to know when we'll support Apache 2.2 :) Regards, Nicolas -- Forwarded message

Re: 3.2.6 test period - how long do we wait?

2006-01-31 Thread Deron Meranda
On 1/31/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > apache 2.2. I scanned mod_python for deprecated or removed apr calls and > can find only one (apr_sockaddr_port_get), plus the missing > APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS macro. The apr_sockaddr_port_get() call was introduced by me to support IPv6 in modp

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-78) No support for Apache 2.2 yet

2006-01-31 Thread Deron Meranda (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-78?page=comments#action_12364671 ] Deron Meranda commented on MODPYTHON-78: One small incompatibility is the call to the APR function apr_sockaddr_port_get(), as introduced in the fix for bug MODPYTH

Re: 3.2.6 test period - how long do we wait?

2006-01-31 Thread Deron Meranda
On 1/31/06, Deron Meranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/31/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > apache 2.2. I scanned mod_python for deprecated or removed apr calls and > > can find only one (apr_sockaddr_port_get), plus the missing > > APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS macro. > > The apr_socka

Re: 3.2.6 test period - how long do we wait?

2006-01-31 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: I assume we will be doing a 3.2.7 release if Graham's fix for the ConnectionHandler / MODPYTHON-102 problem works? Unfortunately, the answer is yes... As much as we'd like to release it sooner, I think it's important to not loose the perspective that

Re: 3.2.6 test period - how long do we wait?

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: OK, so shall we schedule the 3.2.x release for 2007, then ? As for the Apache 2.2 version, what if we roll in your suggested patch, Jim, then discover a bunch of problem related to it during the beta tests ? Will we wait until they are all fixed to release the 3.2 version ?

Re: 3.2.6 test period - how long do we wait?

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher
Deron Meranda wrote: On 1/31/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: apache 2.2. I scanned mod_python for deprecated or removed apr calls and can find only one (apr_sockaddr_port_get), plus the missing APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS macro. The apr_sockaddr_port_get() call was introduced by me to

Re: Fwd: Contact request from Nokia Opensource / Research site user.

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher
This is pretty cool. Thanks for taking the time to make the contact Nicolas. (And thanks to Johan for responding). Jim Nicolas Lehuen wrote: FYI, Johan Wikman from Nokia answered my request. He's OK for us to brag about mod_python 3.1.3 running on the Nokia S60 platform, though he doesn't wan

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-78) No support for Apache 2.2 yet

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-78?page=comments#action_12364708 ] Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-78: I scanned mod_python 3.2.6 for the existence of other deprecated apr functions listed in the APR change log and nothing els

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-78) No support for Apache 2.2 yet

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-78?page=comments#action_12364730 ] Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-78: I thought I could edit a JIRA comment but perhaps not. Anyway, the above should read: Apache 2.2 now uses apr 1.x (Apache

Re: 3.2.6 test period - how long do we wait?

2006-01-31 Thread Graham Dumpleton
I am having problems with posts to python-dev mailing list from home occassionally disappearing in a black hole. Thus my post on this topic before Jim brought it up in the first place vanished. What I has said was: >> this code runs smoothly, i.e. no segfaults, all tests passed: >> FreeBSD 4.9: >>

Re: mod_python as a mod_dav backend

2006-01-31 Thread Graham Dumpleton
This is a resend to python-dev list of an email I sent yesterday. For some reason oaccsional email I am sending to list from home is dissappearing, although people cc'd it are getting it. Apologies if this is a duplicate. On 30/01/2006, at 9:49 PM, Matt Carpenter wrote: > Graham Dumpleton wrote:

Re: 3.2.6 test period - how long do we wait?

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher
Good enough for me. Shall we vote? If so I am: +1 Jim Graham Dumpleton wrote: I am having problems with posts to python-dev mailing list from home occassionally disappearing in a black hole. Thus my post on this topic before Jim brought it up in the first place vanished. What I has said was:

Re: mod_python as a mod_dav backend

2006-01-31 Thread Graham Dumpleton
And another one that seemed to vanish into thing air. On 31/01/2006, at 10:11 PM, Matt Carpenter wrote: > > > Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> Regardless of how you might use it, from a technical standpoint I >> would say that >> it is not going to be possible at present. >> >> One could imagine bein

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-78) No support for Apache 2.2 yet

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-78?page=comments#action_12364737 ] Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-78: Unit Test Issue: mod_auth.so dependency mod_auth.so has been split into separate modules in Apache 2.2 (mod_auth_basic, mo

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-78) No support for Apache 2.2 yet

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Gallacher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-78?page=comments#action_12364741 ] Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-78: Unit Test Issue: KeepAliveTimeout In htdocs/tests.py, test_server_members tests the value of KeepAliveTimeout. The default