Re: [Python-Dev] [C++-sig] GCC version compatibility

2005-07-16 Thread Anthony Baxter
On Saturday 16 July 2005 20:13, Christoph Ludwig wrote: > I submitted patch #1239112 that implements the test involving two TUs for > Python 2.4. I plan to work on a more comprehensive patch for Python 2.5 but > that will take some time. I'm only vaguely aware of all of the issues here with linkin

Re: [Python-Dev] [C++-sig] GCC version compatibility

2005-07-16 Thread David Abrahams
Christoph Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I submitted patch #1239112 that implements the test involving two TUs for > Python 2.4. I plan to work on a more comprehensive patch for Python 2.5 but > that will take some time. Thanks very much for your efforts, Christoph! -- Dave Abrahams Boost

Re: [Python-Dev] Some RFE for review

2005-07-16 Thread Reinhold Birkenfeld
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote: > Hi, > > while bugs and patches are sometimes tricky to close, RFE can be very easy > to decide whether to implement in the first place. So what about working a > bit on this front? Here are several RFE reviewed, perhaps some can be > closed ("should" is always from sub

Re: [Python-Dev] [C++-sig] GCC version compatibility

2005-07-16 Thread Christoph Ludwig
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 07:41:06PM +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Christoph Ludwig wrote: > > My point is: The test implemented in the 2.4.1 configure script gives a > > wrong > > result if your platform happens to be x86 Linux with ELF binaries and > > g++ 4.0. [...] > > But I digress. It's

Re: [Python-Dev] Adding the 'path' module (was Re: Some RFE for review)

2005-07-16 Thread Neil Hodgson
Martin v. Löwis: > - But then, the wide API gives all results as Unicode. If you want to > promote only those entries that need it, it really means that you > only want to "demote" those that don't need it. But how can you tell > whether an entry needs it? There is no API to find out. I