Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
>>You even argued against having non-ASCII identifiers:
>>
>>http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2002-May/102936.html
>
>
> I see :-) It seems I have changed my mind since then (which
> apparently predates PEP 263).
>
> One issue I appare
Greg Ewing wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
>
>>If you are told to debug a program
>>written by say a Japanese programmer using Japanese identifiers
>>you are going to have a really hard time.
>
>
> Or you could look upon it as an opportunity to
> broaden your mental horizons by learning some
>
The Python source code repository is now converted to subversion;
please feel free to start checking out new sandboxes. For a few
days, this installation probably still needs to be considered in
testing. If there are no serious problems found by next Monday,
I would consider conversion of the data
> "martin" == martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
martin> The Python source code repository is now converted to
martin> subversion; please feel free to start checking out new
martin> sandboxes.
Excellent... Thanks for all the effort.
Skip
___
Can anyone point an old CVS/Perforce-Luddite at instructions for how
to use the new SVN repository?
Jeremy
On 10/23/05, Michael Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd like to start the subversion switchover this coming Wednesday,
> > with a tot
David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> Is the instruction at
>>> http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/inst/tweak-flags.html#SECTION000622000
>>> still relevant? I am not 100% certain I didn't make one my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The Python source code repository is now converted to subversion;
> [...]
Thanks for doing this.
BTW, will there be daily tarballs, like the one available from:
http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/python/python/python-latest.tar.gz
Bye,
Walter Dörwald
_
Michael Chermside wrote:
> Guido writes:
>> I find "AttributeError: __exit__" just as informative.
>
> Eric Nieuwland responds:
>> I see. Then why don't we unify *Error into Error?
>> Just read the message and know what it means.
>> And we could then drop the burden of exception classes and only u
Jeremy> Can anyone point an old CVS/Perforce-Luddite at instructions for
Jeremy> how to use the new SVN repository?
Jeremy,
I'd never used Subversion until Barry grabbed the python.org web maintainers
by our collective ears and dragged us to the table with the kool aid. As it
turns out,
Hello,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> martin> The Python source code repository is now converted to
> martin> subversion; please feel free to start checking out new
> martin> sandboxes.
>
> Excellent... Thanks for all the effort.
Good work. I checked the http and viewcvs access and all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The Python source code repository is now converted to subversion;
> please feel free to start checking out new sandboxes. For a few
> days, this installation probably still needs to be considered in
> testing. If there are no serious problems found by next Monday,
> I w
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> Can anyone point an old CVS/Perforce-Luddite at instructions for how
> to use the new SVN repository?
And can you remind us where to send our public keys? :)
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714
On 10/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Python source code repository is now converted to subversion;
> please feel free to start checking out new sandboxes.
Woo hoo! Thanks for all the hard work and good thinking, Martin.
> Most of you are probably interested in checking
Jim> And can you remind us where to send our public keys? :)
Jim,
Send your keys to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless you specify otherwise, your
login will probably be "jim.fulton".
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.pyt
Walter Dörwald wrote:
> Thanks for doing this.
>
> BTW, will there be daily tarballs, like the one available from:
> http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/python/python/python-latest.tar.gz
Will be, yes (I'm saddened that you refer to this location, and not
http://www.dcl.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/home/loewis/p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Though there's no svn/cvs cheatsheet there, you may also find isolated
> tidbits in the Subversion FAQ:
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html
>
> Just grep around for "cvs".
In addition, you might want to read
http://www.python.org/dev/svn.html
Regards,
Marti
Jim Fulton wrote:
>> Can anyone point an old CVS/Perforce-Luddite at instructions for how
>> to use the new SVN repository?
>
>
> And can you remind us where to send our public keys? :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] should work; you will get a confirmation when they
are installed.
Regards,
Martin
_
I'm trying to make a module to support inotify (linux). I put together a
module using boost::python. Problem is, inotify uses a file descriptor.
If I call python os.fdopen on it, I get an error:
Python 2.4.1 (#1, May 16 2005, 15:15:14)
[GCC 4.0.0 20050512 (Red Hat 4.0.0-5)] on linux2
Type "help"
Patch / Bug Summary
___
Patches : 360 open (+16) / 2956 closed ( +1) / 3316 total (+17)
Bugs: 893 open (+10) / 5353 closed (+12) / 6246 total (+22)
RFE : 199 open ( -2) / 189 closed ( +2) / 388 total ( +0)
New / Reopened Patches
__
Patch for
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Woo hoo! Thanks for all the hard work and good thinking, Martin.
My pleasure!
>>svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/python/trunk
>>svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/python/branches/release24-maint
>>svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/peps
>
>
> This doesn't work for me. I'm sure the proble
On Thursday 27 October 2005 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Send your keys to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless you specify otherwise, your
> login will probably be "jim.fulton".
Mail to pydotorg doesn't allow posting from non-members; I watch for
notifications for owner on that list and try to appro
Wolfgang Langner wrote:
> But why is an old subversion used ?
> (Powered by Subversion version 1.1.4)
That's the one Debian provides. We don't build our own, but use
Debian packages for everything.
Also, subversion 1.1 is not old: it was released on Oct 4, 2004;
1.1.4 is less than a year old.
Re
Michael Hudson wrote:
> Do checkins to svn.python.org go to the python-checkins list already?
They do indeed - you should have received one commit message by now
(me testing whether committing works, on PEP 347).
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing l
David Abrahams wrote:
> As it turns out, MinGW also implemented, in version 3.0.0 (with
> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1), features which make the creation of
> libpython24.a unnecessary. So whoever maintains this doc might want
> to note that you only need that step if you are using a version of
> P
Neal Becker wrote:
> Any ideas? I'd rather not have to trace through python if I could avoid it
> (I don't even have source installed here).
Use strace, then. Find out what precise system call gives you this
error. If this is not enough clue, post the relevant fragment of the
trace output. Usage
Greg Ewing wrote:
> I still think this is a much worse potential problem
> than that of "l" vs "1", etc. It's reasonable to
> adopt the practice of never using "l" as a single
> letter identifier, for example. But it would be
> unreasonable to ban the use of "E" as an identifier
> on the grounds th
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> Mail to pydotorg doesn't allow posting from non-members; I watch for
> notifications for owner on that list and try to approve as quickly as
> possible, but it's a manual process just to get the mail through.
Ah, didn't know this.
> We should probably have a dedicate
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> Any ideas? I'd rather not have to trace through python if I could avoid
>> it (I don't even have source installed here).
>
> Use strace, then. Find out what precise system call gives you this
> error. If this is not enough clue, post the relevant
On Thursday 27 October 2005 14:16, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I think I would request a separate address; I don't think I want to get
> all webmaster email.
I like the idea of a separate address as well.
> That address should probably include webmaster, though.
Are you suggesting that the key-d
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> As it turns out, MinGW also implemented, in version 3.0.0 (with
>> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1), features which make the creation of
>> libpython24.a unnecessary. So whoever maintains this doc might want
>> to note that you
David Abrahams wrote:
> This isn't rocket science. Or maybe it is; if adding
>
> These instructions only apply if you're using a version of Python
> prior to 2.4.1 with a MinGW prior to 3.0.0 (with
> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1)
>
> is not acceptable then no patch I could submit would be a
Am 27.10.2005 um 19:18 schrieb Martin v. Löwis:
> Walter Dörwald wrote:
>
>> Thanks for doing this.
>> BTW, will there be daily tarballs, like the one available from:
>> http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/python/python/python-latest.tar.gz
>>
>
> Will be, yes (I'm saddened that you refer to this locati
Neal Becker wrote:
> Yes, tried that- learned nothing.
Please go back further in the trace file. There must be a return
value of -1 (EISDIR) somewhere in the file, try to locate that.
> Here's strace. The write of '4' is where my code writes the value of
> fileno() to stdout, which is '4', which
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> Yes, tried that- learned nothing.
>
> Please go back further in the trace file. There must be a return
> value of -1 (EISDIR) somewhere in the file, try to locate that.
>
>> Here's strace. The write of '4' is where my code writes the value of
>>
Fred> Are you suggesting that the key-deposit address be routed to the
Fred> webmaster crew? Most of the webmasters don't have the access
Fred> needed to deposit keys.
In fact, many of us on the pydotorg list don't have ssh access either. I
suspect the number of useful recipients is
Neal Becker wrote:
> SYS_253(0, 0x7f88f0f0, 0x2dda3f00, 0x2ab4611b, 0x7) = 4
> close(3)= 0
> futex(0x502530, FUTEX_WAKE, 1) = 0
> futex(0x502530, FUTEX_WAKE, 1) = 0
> fstat(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 3), ...}) = 0
> m
Walter Dörwald wrote:
> BTW, ViewCVS seems to be missing the stylesheet. http://
> svn.python.org/view/*docroot*/styles.css gives an exception
> complaining about "No such file or directory: '/etc/viewcvs/doc/
> styles.css'"
Thanks, fixed. I already wondered why I was supposed to
create a /vie
On 10/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> Most of you are probably interested in checking out one of these
> folders:
>
> svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/python/trunk
> svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/python/branches/release24-maint
> svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/peps
>
Why the ent
On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>
>> I see. Python is making up the EISDIR, looking at the stat result.
>> In Objects/fileobject.c:dircheck generates the EISDIR error, which
>> apparently comes from posix_fdopen, PyFile_FromFile,
>> fill_file_fields.
>>
Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>
>>> I see. Python is making up the EISDIR, looking at the stat result.
>>> In Objects/fileobject.c:dircheck generates the EISDIR error, which
>>> apparently comes from posix_fdopen, PyFile_Fr
On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:58 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>>
>>>
I see. Python is making up the EISDIR, looking at the stat result.
In Objects/fileobject.c:dircheck generates the EI
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I see. Python is making up the EISDIR, looking at the stat result.
> In Objects/fileobject.c:dircheck generates the EISDIR error, which
> apparently comes from posix_fdopen, PyFile_FromFile,
> fill_file_fields.
>
> Python simply does not support file objects which stat
Josiah Carlson:
> According to wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_alphabet),
> various languages have adopted a transliteration of their language
> and/or former alphabets into latin. They don't purport to know all of
> the reasons why, and I'm not going to speculate.
I used to wor
I have started a svn section in the dev FAQ
(http://www.python.org/dev/devfaq.html) pertaining to checking out a
project from the repository and other stuff discussed so far. If
something is not clear or people feel a step is missing, let me know.
I will remove the CVS section once Martin has tos
[Brett Cannon]
> I have started a svn section in the dev FAQ
> (http://www.python.org/dev/devfaq.html) pertaining to checking out a
> project from the repository and other stuff discussed so far. If
> something is not clear or people feel a step is missing, let me know.
Thanks, Brett! I'm just s
Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:58 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I see. Python is making up the EISDIR, looking at the stat result.
> In Objects
Brett> I have started a svn section in the dev FAQ
Brett> (http://www.python.org/dev/devfaq.html) pertaining to checking
Brett> out a project from the repository and other stuff discussed so
Brett> far. If something is not clear or people feel a step is missing,
Brett> let me
On 10/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Brett> I have started a svn section in the dev FAQ
> Brett> (http://www.python.org/dev/devfaq.html) pertaining to checking
> Brett> out a project from the repository and other stuff discussed so
> Brett> far. If somethin
Well, I am at it again, but this time Guido is a co-conspirator. We
wrote a PEP that introduces BaseException and moves KeyboardInterrupt
and SystemExit. Even if you followed the discussion for PEP 348 you
should read the PEP since I am sure there will be something that
someone doesn't like, such
On Thursday 27 October 2005 23:03, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I guess, but I just don't like wikis personally so I have no
> inclination to make the conversion. If someone wants to make the
> conversion over to the wiki and keep it up that's fine, but I have no
> problem keeping the dev FAQ updated
Brett Cannon wrote:
> Why the entire 'peps' directory and not just the trunk like with
> 'python'? It looks like no tags or branches have ever been created
> for the PEPs and thus are not really needed.
Right.
> I am also curious as to what you would have me check out for the
> sandbox; whole di
51 matches
Mail list logo