On Saturday 19 August 2006 06:24, Jim Jewett wrote:
> This makes things more consistent for today, but does it really ease
> maintenance?
>
> Why not just change it to:
>
> from sys import version as IDLE_VERSION
>
> so that it can be ignored from now on?
After the fuss about changing distutils' v
On Saturday 19 August 2006 15:28, Georg Brandl wrote:
> John J Lee wrote:
> > Revision 50842 made a change to an undocumented interface of urllib2 that
> > I'm sure will break real code.
> >
> > Patch 1542948 reverts the part of that commit that applied to urllib2,
> > and adds a one-line fix in it
[Steve Holden]
>> Reasonable enough, but I suspect that Thomas' suggestion might save us
>> from raising false hopes. I'd suggest that the final release
>> announcement point out that this is the first release containing
>> specific support for 64-bit architectures (if indeed it is)
[Martin v. Löw
Tim Peters wrote:
> [Steve Holden]
>
>>> Reasonable enough, but I suspect that Thomas' suggestion might save us
>>> from raising false hopes. I'd suggest that the final release
>>> announcement point out that this is the first release containing
>>> specific support for 64-bit architectures (if in
Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 19 August 2006 06:24, Jim Jewett wrote:
>> This makes things more consistent for today, but does it really ease
>> maintenance?
>>
>> Why not just change it to:
>>
>> from sys import version as IDLE_VERSION
>>
>> so that it can be ignored fr
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:34:16AM +0100, Steve Holden wrote:
> Scott Dial wrote:
> > Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >
> >>I just got a report from a Windows user that os.spawnlp() is missing
> >>from Python 2.4, despite being mentioned in the docs. Can someone
> >>confirm this? My Windows box is resti
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 05:19:40AM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Steve Holden]
> >> Reasonable enough, but I suspect that Thomas' suggestion might save us
> >> from raising false hopes. I'd suggest that the final release
> >> announcement point out that this is the first release containing
> >> speci
On 8/19/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alternatively, someone who prefers your style (with a tearDown() method that
> can handle a partially executed call to the setUp() method), can just write
> it as:
>
> def setUp(self)
> try:
> lock_file(testfile) # open_socket
"Jack Diederich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Availability: Unix: All, Windows: spawnl(), spawnle(), spawnv(),
> spawnve() only. New in version 1.6
>
> Might as well positively list the half that is there instead of the half
> that isn't.
Definitately. Succinc
Collin Winter wrote:
> Any thoughts on the other four items?
Generally speaking, I'm not sure it's worth the effort to do the input
validation. All of the cases you suggest ruling out do indeed seem to be
insane, but someone may have defined a subclass that does something based on
the current b
Is this a bug?
# run with 2.4 and then with 2.5 (I'm running release25-maint:51410)
class a(object):
def __getattribute__(self, name):
print "accessing %r.%s" % (self, name)
return object.__getattribute__(self, name)
def __str__(self):
print "__str__"
Can I have this key added?-- Jackilyn Hoxworth
jah_key.pub
Description: Binary data
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/arc
John J Lee wrote:
> Is this a bug?
I don't believe so - the string formatting documentation states that the
result will be unicode if either the format string is unicode or any of the
objects passed to a %s format code is unicode.
That latter part has just been extended to include any object th
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Oren Tirosh wrote:
> Compatibility with Windows "GUIDs" may be one of the most important
> use cases for the UUID module. It's important to resolve this or users
> will have unpleasant surprises. I did.
[...]
> alternatives:
>
> 1. Default is big endian byte order. Little endia
On 8/19/06, Jack Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It has always "just worked" for me on Opterons + Debian.Python 2.4 (#1, May 31 2005, 10:19:45)[GCC 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-12)] on linux2Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import sys>>> sys.maxint92233720368
15 matches
Mail list logo
