~b ea2499da0911051453n3569387aj581ad4acf5b79...@mail.gmail.com
4222a8490911051521r1b9c8165id6e0f12d62da0...@mail.gmail.com
ca471dc20911051526u7f3642ecg19e4eb73bcca1...@mail.gmail.com
bbaeab100911051535g68cefa18kdadea33f78de9...@mail.gmail.com
On Nov 6, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
R. David Murray schrieb:
So, overall I think the buildbot fleet is in good shape, and if
we can nail issue 6748 I think it will be back to being an
important resource for sanity checking our checkins.
Yay! Thanks to all of you!
Indeed! It's
On Nov 6, 2009, at 4:52 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 09:48 pm, rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 at 15:48, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
Documentation would be great, but then you have to get people to
read the documentation and that's kind of tricky. Better would be
Hi Antoine,
I was finally able to compile py3k and run the benchmark (my compilation
issue was caused by checking out on Windows and compiling on Unix. Some
Makefile templates are missing correct EOL properties in SVN I think).
The benchmark results can be obtained from:
On 12:10 pm, s...@pobox.com wrote:
Guido ... it's IMO pretty mysterious if you encounter this and
don't
Guido already happen to know what it means.
If you require parens maybe it parses better:
import (a or b or c) as mod
Given that the or operator shortcuts I think that (a or b or
On Nov 7, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:52 PM, David Lyon
david.l...@preisshare.net wrote:
I think buildbot-style test runs for PyPI packages would raise average
package quality on PyPI.
Please excuse the
Hello,
Solaris X86, 16 cores: some python extension are likely missing (see
config.log)
Windows XP SP3, 4 cores: all python extensions but TCL (I didn't bother
checking why it failed as it is not used in the benchmark). It is a release
build.
The results look promising but I let you share
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:30 AM, sstein...@gmail.com sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 7, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:52 PM, David Lyon david.l...@preisshare.net
wrote:
I think buildbot-style test runs for PyPI
On Nov 7, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:30 AM, sstein...@gmail.com sstein...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Nov 7, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:52 PM, David Lyon david.l...@preisshare.net
Antoine,
How close are you to merging this into the Py3k branch? It looks like
a solid piece of work, that can only get better in the period between
now and the release of 3.2. But I don't want to rush you, and I only
have had a brief look at your code. (I whipped up a small Dave Beazley
example
exar...@twistedmatrix.com schrieb:
On 12:10 pm, s...@pobox.com wrote:
Guido ... it's IMO pretty mysterious if you encounter this and
don't
Guido already happen to know what it means.
If you require parens maybe it parses better:
import (a or b or c) as mod
Given that the or
Hello Guido,
How close are you to merging this into the Py3k branch? It looks like
a solid piece of work, that can only get better in the period between
now and the release of 3.2. But I don't want to rush you, and I only
have had a brief look at your code.
The code is ready. Priority
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello Guido,
How close are you to merging this into the Py3k branch? It looks like
a solid piece of work, that can only get better in the period between
now and the release of 3.2. But I don't want to rush you, and I
2009/11/7 Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
[...]
So, to sum it up, the way the current GIL manages to have good latencies is
by
issueing an unreasonable number of system calls on a contended lock, and
potentially killing throughput performance (this depends on the OS too,
because
Hello again,
It shows that, on my platform for this specific benchmark:
* newgil manage to leverage a significant amount of parallelism
(1.7) where python 3.1 does not (3.1 is 80% slower)
I think you are mistaken:
-j0 (main thread only)
newgil: 47.483s, 47.605s, 47.512s
-j4
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:05:17 am Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
wrote:
I've checked draft (!) PEP 3003, Python Language Moratorium, into
SVN. As authors I've listed Jesse, Brett and myself.
I haven't seen substantial opposition
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:46:00 pm Willem Broekema wrote:
CLPython is in steady development, quite complete and stable on the
language level (somewhere between 2.5 and 2.6), but missing most
built-in library functionality. (It reuses the pure-Python parts of
the stdlib.)
As its developer, I
...
A moratorium isn't cost-free. With the back-end free to change, patches
will go stale over 2+ years. People will lose interest or otherwise
move on. Those with good ideas but little patience will be discouraged.
I fully expect that, human nature being as it is, those proposing a
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
Willem, the rationale for this PEP is to give alternative
implementations the chance to catch up with CPython.
Given your statement that CLPython is quite complete on the language
level, but missing standard library
19 matches
Mail list logo
