2010/4/6 Barry Warsaw :
> On Apr 01, 2010, at 04:12 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>>I now have a working implementation of PEP 3147 which passes all the existing,
>>and new, tests. I'm sure there's still work to do, but I think the branch
>>is in good enough shape to start getting some feedback from p
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:18:13 +0200, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=
wrote:
> > Can someone (Steve Turnbull?) confirm or refute my analysis?
>
> Refute, see http://bugs.python.org/issue804885
>
> > ISO-2022 input will
> > be 7-bit, and the except will not trigger
>
> This conclusion
On Apr 01, 2010, at 04:12 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>I now have a working implementation of PEP 3147 which passes all the existing,
>and new, tests. I'm sure there's still work to do, but I think the branch
>is in good enough shape to start getting some feedback from python-dev.
Thanks to Antoine
Greg Ewing wrote:
> Michael Foord wrote:
>
>> *However*, a project that would be interesting - and that I have
>> wanted to do in order to program microcontrollers with *very* small
>> memory address spaces [1] - would be to compile a static subset of
>> Python down to C.
>
> That would be an exc
Let's do it. Please no commits to the trunk which are not aimed at
fixing the current buildbot failures. Thank you!
2010/4/6 "Martin v. Löwis" :
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> I propose that we freeze the trunk except for fixes for the buildbots.
>> Thoughts?
>
> Freezing sounds fine with me.
>
>
> Can someone (Steve Turnbull?) confirm or refute my analysis?
Refute, see http://bugs.python.org/issue804885
> ISO-2022 input will
> be 7-bit, and the except will not trigger
This conclusion is false:
1. it is 7-bit
py> unichr(913).encode("iso-2022-jp")
'\x1b$B&!\x1b(B'
2. the except *will*
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 04:25:08 pm Cesare Di Mauro wrote:
> It will certainly. There's MUCH that can be optimized to let CPython
> squeeze more performance from static analysis (even a gross one) on
> locals.
[...]
> They are just "dummy" examples, but can make it clear how far
> optimizations can go
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> I propose that we freeze the trunk except for fixes for the buildbots.
> Thoughts?
Freezing sounds fine with me.
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsu
A long time ago (in a galaxy far far...no, wrong show)
Er, as I was saying, a long time ago Barry applied a patch to
email that went more or less like this:
ndex: email/Encoders.py
===
--- email/Encoders.py (revision 35918)
+++ ema
I propose that we freeze the trunk except for fixes for the buildbots. Thoughts?
--
Regards,
Benjamin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/optio
On 06/04/2010 23:34, Michael Foord wrote:
On 06/04/2010 23:31, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
will...@ufpa.br wrote:
First, thank you for all opnion. Each one was considered.
I think the better question would be:
I have to develop a project that involves compilers, and being a fan of
Python, I though
On 06/04/2010 23:31, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
will...@ufpa.br wrote:
First, thank you for all opnion. Each one was considered.
I think the better question would be:
I have to develop a project that involves compilers, and being a fan of
Python, I thought about making a compiler for it (most
will...@ufpa.br wrote:
> First, thank you for all opnion. Each one was considered.
> I think the better question would be:
> I have to develop a project that involves compilers, and being a fan of
> Python, I thought about making a compiler for it (most basic idea involving
> Pythin and compilers).
On 06.04.2010 11:50, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
And the script that generates that output is available from the cheeseshop:
Michael Foord wrote:
*However*, a project that would be interesting - and that I have wanted
to do in order to program microcontrollers with *very* small memory
address spaces [1] - would be to compile a static subset of Python down
to C.
That would be an excellent project -- if the result w
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Brett Cannon python.org> writes:
> >
> >
> > Nope, you got it right. A little bit of documentation is in
> > 2.7: http://docs.python.org/dev/library/warnings.html#updating-code-for-
>
> It is a bit disturbing, though, that "-Wdefault" isn't t
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:42, C. Titus Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:36:14PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> > >
> > Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
> > >>>
> > >>> Here:
> > >>>
> > >>> h
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:36:14PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> >
> Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
> >>>
> >>> Here:
> >>>
> >>> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
> >>
> >> Thank you. What is the status
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
>>>
>>> Here:
>>>
>>> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
>>
>> Thank you. What is the status of getting these stats on python.org?
>
> Wouldn't "status" imply that there is a pl
Brett Cannon python.org> writes:
>
>
> Nope, you got it right. A little bit of documentation is in
> 2.7: http://docs.python.org/dev/library/warnings.html#updating-code-for-
It is a bit disturbing, though, that "-Wdefault" isn't the default setting.
How could that oddity be solved?
Regards
An
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 04:19, Larry Hastings wrote:
> Jesus Cea wrote:
>
>> Recently we added "-Wd" flags to buildbots. I was wondering about the
>> effect of it. documentation doesn't help.
>>
>> I could study the code, but I guess other people can have the very same
>> question and I think the
Am 06.04.2010 13:50, schrieb anatoly techtonik:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
>>> Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
>>
>> Here:
>>
>> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
>
> Thank you. What is the status of getting these stats on python.org?
Senthil Kumaran gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> > Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
>
> Here:
>
> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
The fact that the log shows some test failures isn't very comforting.
Re
On 06/04/2010 12:44, will...@ufpa.br wrote:
First, thank you for all opnion. Each one was considered.
I think the better question would be:
I have to develop a project that involves compilers, and being a fan of
Python, I thought about making a compiler for it (most basic idea involving
Pythin an
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Reid Kleckner wrote:
>
> If I remember correctly, the exec statement is going away in py3k, and
>> calling exec() with one argument can modify the local scope.
>>
>
> I've been kind of wondering what the deal is with exec in py3.
> I always tho
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
>> Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
>
> Here:
>
> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
Thank you. What is the status of getting these stats on python.org?
--
anatoly t.
First, thank you for all opnion. Each one was considered.
I think the better question would be:
I have to develop a project that involves compilers, and being a fan of
Python, I thought about making a compiler for it (most basic idea involving
Pythin and compilers). But I saw that I can use what I
Jesus Cea wrote:
Recently we added "-Wd" flags to buildbots. I was wondering about the
effect of it. documentation doesn't help.
I could study the code, but I guess other people can have the very same
question and I think the answer should be in the archives, somewhere.
I studied the code ;)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recently we added "-Wd" flags to buildbots. I was wondering about the
effect of it. documentation doesn't help.
I could study the code, but I guess other people can have the very same
question and I think the answer should be in the archives, somewher
2010/4/6 Greg Ewing
> Cesare Di Mauro wrote:
>
> It will certainly. There's MUCH that can be optimized to let CPython
>> squeeze more performance from static analysis (even a gross one) on locals.
>>
>
> But can the existing locals() function be implemented in
> the face of such optimisations?
>
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
--
Senthil
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.pytho
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:54 PM, wrote:
> for a college project, I proposed to create a compiler for python. I've
> read something about it and maybe I saw that made a bad choice. I hear
> everyone's opinion respond.
Depending on your taste, you may want to tackle something like a
static analyse
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
--
anatoly t.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40
Cesare Di Mauro wrote:
It will certainly. There's MUCH that can be optimized to let CPython
squeeze more performance from static analysis (even a gross one) on locals.
But can the existing locals() function be implemented in
the face of such optimisations?
If it can, then a "locals view" obje
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Except none of the things mentioned above is actually a "Python
compiler".
No, but they grapple with many of the same issues that a Python
compiler would face, and it would be informative to see how
they tackle those issues. If you want to advance the state of
the art
Reid Kleckner wrote:
If I remember correctly, the exec statement is going away in py3k, and
calling exec() with one argument can modify the local scope.
I've been kind of wondering what the deal is with exec in py3.
I always thought the reason for making exec a statement was so
that locals opt
36 matches
Mail list logo
