On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 02:40:19PM -, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> This list would make a good addition to one of the cpython development
> pages. If potential contributors could find this information, then
> they'd be much more likely to participate by doing reviews.
If anyone want
> You still want the auditor to make sure, but it is possible to set the
> default in the page template. Would you like a patch for that for
> consideration? If so, are there other elements it might be useful to
> have defaults for? (I would submit each as a separate patch.)
Feel free to submit
A.M. Kuchling writes:
> True. This makes me wonder if we should be data-mining the tracker
> information to look for significant contributors that no one has
> noticed.
It's an interesting idea. But I've done something similar to this, ad
hoc[1], a few times in XEmacs, and it has never worke
A.M. Kuchling amk.ca> writes:
>
> True. This makes me wonder if we should be data-mining the tracker
> information to look for significant contributors that no one has
> noticed.
I'd say that we usually notice them, since we process their patches or read
their reviews and comments. Unless perha
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:46:37AM +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> their ability to gain recognition for their merit. It's not enough to
> be good at what you do, people have to know it. Ten high-quality
> patches for high-profile bugs in a week may get you enhanced
> privileges, while thirty hi
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:22:02 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote:
> You still want the auditor to make sure, but it is possible to set the
> default in the page template. Would you like a patch for that for
> consideration? If so, are there other elements it might be useful to
> have defaults fo
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:16:48 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
> > As I see it, the two camps are divided purely on the question of how to
> > get increased privileges.
>
> As I see it, the division is over what constitutes merit, and how it
> is created or impr
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:16:48 pm Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
> > As I see it, the two camps are divided purely on the question of
> > how to get increased privileges.
>
> As I see it, the division is over what constitutes merit, and how it
> is created or improved.
>
> >
"Martin v. Löwis" writes:
>
> > When I open http://bugs.python.org/iss...@template=item
> > priority is (still) set at no selection. Is this my local cache (which I
> > do not know how to clear in FF) or is 'normal' filled in after submission?
>
> It is filled in after submission.
You stil
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> As I see it, the two camps are divided purely on the question of how to
> get increased privileges.
As I see it, the division is over what constitutes merit, and how it
is created or improved.
> Both sides agree that merit is a requirement, but the disagreement
> i
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 23:55, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I believe the more important part of Barry's suggested change here is
> requiring a link to the archived message (usually from python-dev) where
> the PEP was accepted (be it directly by you as BDFL, or by consensus
> from a "sufficient" number
11 matches
Mail list logo
