Hi All,
On 06/01/12 10:25, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/5/2012 3:01 PM, Paul Smedley wrote:
File ./setup.py, line 1154, in detect_modules
for arg in sysconfig.get_config_var(__CONFIG_ARGS).split()]
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'split'
make: *** [sharedmods] Error 1
File
On 1/7/2012 3:48 AM, Paul Smedley wrote:
using _init_posix() for 'os2' instead of _init_non_posix is the fix for
this.
sysconfig.py also needs the following changes:
--- \dev\Python-2.7.2-o\Lib\sysconfig.py 2012-01-06 19:27:14.0
+1030
+++ sysconfig.py 2012-01-07 19:03:00.0
Christian Heimes, 31.12.2011 04:59:
Am 31.12.2011 03:22, schrieb Victor Stinner:
The unique structure of CPython's dict implementation makes it harder to
get the number of values with equal hash. The academic hash map (the one
I learnt about at university) uses a bucket to store all elements
2012/1/7 Charles-François Natali neolo...@free.fr:
Thanks for those precisions, but I must admit it doesn't help me much...
Can we drop it? A yes/no answer will do it ;-)
The yes/no answer is No, we can't drop it.
Even though CPython no longer uses the Python version of RLock in
normal
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 5:17 AM, antoine.pitrou
python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1ea8b7233fd7
changeset: 74288:1ea8b7233fd7
user: Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
date: Fri Jan 06 20:16:19 2012 +0100
summary:
Issue #9993: When the source
Nick did you mean to say wrap python code around a reentrant lock to
create a non-reentrant lock? Isn't that what PyRLock is doing?
FWIW having now read issues 13697 and 13550, I'm +1 for dropping Python
RLock, and all the logging machinery in threading.
2012/1/8 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
2012/1/8 Matt Joiner anacro...@gmail.com:
Nick did you mean to say wrap python code around a reentrant lock to create
a non-reentrant lock? Isn't that what PyRLock is doing?
Actually, I should have said recursive, not reentrant.
FWIW having now read issues 13697 and 13550, I'm +1 for dropping
Hi Nick,
Am Samstag, 7. Januar 2012 um 14:22 schrieb Nick Coghlan:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1ea8b7233fd7
changeset: 74288:1ea8b7233fd7
user: Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net (mailto:solip...@pitrou.net)
date: Fri Jan 06 20:16:19 2012 +0100
summary:
Issue #9993: When the
Am 07.01.2012 12:02, schrieb Stefan Behnel:
Wouldn't Bob Jenkins' lookup3 hash function fit in here? After all, it's
portable, known to provide a very good distribution for different string
values and is generally fast on both 32 and 64 bit architectures.
I just tried porting Python as a Metro (Windows 8) App, and failed.
Metro Apps use a variant of the Windows API called WinRT that still
allows to write native applications in C++, but restricts various APIs
to a subset of the full Win32 functionality. For example, everything
related to subprocess
On 1/7/2012 12:57 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Am 07.01.2012 12:02, schrieb Stefan Behnel:
Admittedly, this may require some adaptation for the PEP393 unicode memory
layout in order to produce identical hashes for all three representations
if they represent the same content. So it's not a
The subprocess.Popen constructor takes stdin, stdout and stderr keyword
arguments which are supposed to represent the file handles of the child process.
The object also has stdin, stdout and stderr attributes, which one would naively
expect to correspond to the passed in values, except where you
2012/1/7 Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
I just tried porting Python as a Metro (Windows 8) App, and failed.
Is this required for Python to run on Windows 8?
Sorry if that's a dumb question. I'm not sure if Metro App is a
special class of application.
--
Regards,
Benjamin
Zitat von Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org:
2012/1/7 Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
I just tried porting Python as a Metro (Windows 8) App, and failed.
Is this required for Python to run on Windows 8?
No. Existing applications (desktop applications) will continue to work
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 16:07, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
A then-related question is whether Python 3.3 should be compiled with Visual
Studio 11. I'd still be in favor of that, provided Microsoft manages to
release that soon enough.
I'm guessing the change would have to be done before the first
A then-related question is whether Python 3.3 should be compiled with
Visual
Studio 11. I'd still be in favor of that, provided Microsoft manages to
release
that soon enough.
Martin, I assume you mean the Express version of Visual Studio 11 here,
right?
Eli
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 18:57:41 +0100
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
For example, everything
related to subprocess creation would not work; none of the
byte-oriented file API seems to be present, and a number of file
operation functions are absent as well (such as MoveFile).
When you
On 1/7/2012 4:47 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2012/1/7 Martin v. Löwismar...@v.loewis.de:
I just tried porting Python as a Metro (Windows 8) App, and failed.
Is this required for Python to run on Windows 8?
No, normal 'desktop' programs will still run in desktop mode.
Sorry if that's a
Hi Terry,
On 07/01/12 19:47, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/7/2012 3:48 AM, Paul Smedley wrote:
using _init_posix() for 'os2' instead of _init_non_posix is the fix for
this.
sysconfig.py also needs the following changes:
--- \dev\Python-2.7.2-o\Lib\sysconfig.py 2012-01-06 19:27:14.0
+1030
On 1/7/2012 4:25 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
The subprocess.Popen constructor takes stdin, stdout and stderr keyword
arguments which are supposed to represent the file handles of the child process.
The object also has stdin, stdout and stderr attributes, which one would naively
expect to correspond
On 7 January 2012 22:56, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
A then-related question is whether Python 3.3 should be compiled with
Visual
Studio 11. I'd still be in favor of that, provided Microsoft manages to
release
that soon enough.
Martin, I assume you mean the Express version of
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 18:04, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 January 2012 22:56, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
A then-related question is whether Python 3.3 should be compiled with
Visual
Studio 11. I'd still be in favor of that, provided Microsoft manages to
release
Antoine Pitrou:
When you say MoveFile is absent, is MoveFileEx supported instead?
WinRT strongly prefers asynchronous methods for all lengthy
operations. The most likely call to use for moving files is
StorageFile.MoveAsync.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/br227219.aspx
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 21:25:37 + (UTC)
Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The subprocess.Popen constructor takes stdin, stdout and stderr keyword
arguments which are supposed to represent the file handles of the child
process.
The object also has stdin, stdout and stderr attributes,
When you say MoveFile is absent, is MoveFileEx supported instead?
WinRT strongly prefers asynchronous methods for all lengthy
operations. The most likely call to use for moving files is
StorageFile.MoveAsync.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/br227219.aspx
How does
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
I'm not sure it was *well* defined (or even defined at all). It seems
more of a by-product of the implementation. It's not only different
from mv, but it's inconsistent with itself (the semantics are different
depending
Antoine Pitrou:
How does it translate to C?
The simplest technique would be to use C++ code to bridge from C to
the API. If you really wanted to you could explicitly call the
function pointer in the COM vtable but doing COM in C is more effort
than calling through C++.
I'm not sure why
On 2012-01-08, at 01:27 , Antoine Pitrou wrote:
When you say MoveFile is absent, is MoveFileEx supported instead?
WinRT strongly prefers asynchronous methods for all lengthy
operations. The most likely call to use for moving files is
StorageFile.MoveAsync.
Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu writes:
The behavior matches the doc: Popen.stdin
If the stdin argument was PIPE, this attribute is a file object that
provides input to the child process. Otherwise, it is None.
Right, but it's not very helpful, nor especially intuitive. Why does it have to
Mike Meyer mwm at mired.org writes:
Since the only reason they exist is so you can access your end of a
pipe, setting them to anything would seem to be a bug. I'd argue that
their existence is more a pola violation than them having the value
None. But None is easier than a call to hasattr.
I
That's documented behaviour nonetheless. I would agree that the behaviour is a
stupid one (not knowing the reason for it); even so it cannot be changed in a
backwards compatible way.
Am 07.01.2012 um 22:25 schrieb Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk:
The subprocess.Popen constructor takes
On 2012-01-08 10:48 , Vinay Sajip wrote:
Terry Reedytjreedyat udel.edu writes:
The behavior matches the doc: Popen.stdin
If the stdin argument was PIPE, this attribute is a file object that
provides input to the child process. Otherwise, it is None.
Right, but it's not very helpful, nor
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 02:06:33 + (UTC)
Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Mike Meyer mwm at mired.org writes:
Since the only reason they exist is so you can access your end of a
pipe, setting them to anything would seem to be a bug. I'd argue that
their existence is more a pola
Zitat von Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com:
A then-related question is whether Python 3.3 should be compiled with
Visual Studio 11. I'd still be in favor of that, provided Microsoft
manages to
release that soon enough.
Martin, I assume you mean the Express version of Visual Studio 11 here,
When you say MoveFile is absent, is MoveFileEx supported instead?
Or is moving files just totally impossible?
I can't check the SDK headers right now, but according to the online
documentation, MoveFileExW is indeed available. I'm not sure whether
you are allowed to pass arbitrary file names in
Perhaps this is better for another topic, but is anyone using the PGO
stuff? I know we have PGInstrument and PGUpdate build configurations
but I've never seen them mentioned anywhere.
I'm using them in the 32-bit builds. I don't use them for the 64-bit
builds, as the
build machine was a
Zitat von Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net:
When you say MoveFile is absent, is MoveFileEx supported instead?
WinRT strongly prefers asynchronous methods for all lengthy
operations. The most likely call to use for moving files is
StorageFile.MoveAsync.
37 matches
Mail list logo
