I ran into this the other day. I had put in hooks in the PyMem_MALLOC to track
memory per tasklet, and it crashed
in those cases because it was being called without the GIL. My local patch was
simply to _not_ release the GIL.
Clearly, calling PyMem_MALLOC without the GIL is an API violation.
Le Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:31:44 +,
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com a écrit :
I ran into this the other day. I had put in hooks in the
PyMem_MALLOC to track memory per tasklet, and it crashed in those
cases because it was being called without the GIL. My local patch
was simply
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 01:43:11AM -0800, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:31:44 +,
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com a écrit :
I ran into this the other day. I had put in hooks in the
PyMem_MALLOC to track memory per tasklet, and it crashed in those
cases
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Chris Jerdonek
chris.jerdo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Brett Cannon
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-12-14 - 2012-12-21)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open3844 (+18)
closed 24677 (+46)
total 28521 (+64)
Open issues
Hello.
We are sorry but we cannot help you. This mailing list is to work on
developing Python (adding new features to Python itself and fixing bugs);
if you're having problems learning, understanding or using Python, please
find another forum. Probably python-list/comp.lang.python mailing
Hello Mark,
Did you raise bug for this?
--
View this message in context:
http://python.6.n6.nabble.com/Testing-the-tests-by-modifying-the-ordering-of-dict-items-tp3221386p5000138.html
Sent from the Python - python-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Friday, December 21, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Dear python-dev *and* python-ideas,
I am posting PEP 3156 here for early review and discussion. As you can
see from the liberally sprinkled TBD entries it is not done, but I am
about to disappear on vacation for a few weeks
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
I really do like tulip as the name. It's quite pretty.
I chose it because Twisted and Tornado both start with T. But those
have kind of dark associations; I wanted to offset that with something
lighter. (OTOH we could use a
Please stop copying me on this thread.
Thanks,
Jean-Paul
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Hello,
To get the current event loop, use get_event_loop(). This returns an
instance of the EventLoop class defined below or an equivalent
object. It is possible that get_event_loop() returns a different
object depending on the current thread, or depending on some other
notion of context.
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:34:18 +0100 (CET)
guido.van.rossum python-check...@python.org wrote:
- In either case, once it has a socket, it will wrap it in a
- transport, and then enter a loop accepting connections (the best way
- to implement such a loop depends on the platform). Each time a
I really meant *synchronously*... I usually start with working sync code
and then figure out what to do to make it async. I'll give what you suggest
a try.
--Guido van Rossum (sent from Android phone)
On Dec 21, 2012 11:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:37:25 -0800
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I really meant *synchronously*... I usually start with working sync code
and then figure out what to do to make it async. I'll give what you suggest
a try.
Ah. Then I hope the doc example can help you:
Looks reasonable to me :) Comments:
create_transport combines a transport and a protocol. Is that process
reversible? that might seem like an exotic thing (and I guess it kind of
is), but I've wanted this e.g for websockets, and I guess there's a few
other cases where it could be useful :)
Inline.
--Guido van Rossum (sent from Android phone)
On Dec 21, 2012 11:47 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello,
To get the current event loop, use get_event_loop(). This returns an
instance of the EventLoop class defined below or an equivalent
object. It is possible
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't disagree that he shouldn't have cross-posted. I was just
pointing out that the language should be clarified. What's confusing
is
As far as I understand, yield from will always work, because a Future
object can act like an iterator, and you can delegate your own generator to
this iterator at the place of yield from.
yield only works if the parameter behind yield is already a Future
object. Right Guido?
In case of sleep,
We were tentatively calling it concurrent.eventloop at the 2011 language
summit.
--
Sent from my phone, thus the relative brevity :)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Laurens Van Houtven _...@lvh.cc wrote:
Looks reasonable to me :) Comments:
create_transport combines a transport and a protocol. Is that process
reversible? that might seem like an exotic thing (and I guess it kind of
is), but I've wanted this e.g for
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Jonathan Slenders jonat...@slenders.be wrote:
As far as I understand, yield from will always work, because a Future
object can act like an iterator, and you can delegate your own generator to
this iterator at the place of yield from.
yield only works if the
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:37:25 -0800
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I really meant *synchronously*... I usually start with working sync code
and then figure out what to do to make it async. I'll give what you
2012/12/21 Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:37:25 -0800
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I really meant *synchronously*... I usually start with working sync code
and then figure out
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
... snip ...
In PEP 3156 conformant code you're supposed always to use 'yield
from'. The only time you see a bare yield is when it's part
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
... snip ...
In PEP 3156 conformant code you're supposed always to use 'yield
from'. The only time you see a bare yield is when it's part of the
implementation's internals. (However I think tulip actually will
handle a
25 matches
Mail list logo
