On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 09:33:27AM -0800, Brian Curtin wrote:
> Last week in Raymond's dictionary thread, the topic of ARM came up,
> along with the relative lack of build slave coverage. Today Trent
> Nelson received the PandaBoard purchased by the PSF, and a Raspberry
> Pi should be coming shortl
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:48:00AM -0800, Trent Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 09:33:27AM -0800, Brian Curtin wrote:
> > Last week in Raymond's dictionary thread, the topic of ARM came up,
> > along with the relative lack of build slave coverage. Today Trent
> > Nelson received the PandaBo
2013/1/4 Trent Nelson :
> The installation of Ubuntu on the Pandaboard went smoothly.
> However, it crashes after about an hour. Console output:
>
> http://trent.snakebite.net/pandaboard-crash.txt
>
> Any ARM wizards out there with suggestions?
The bug was already reported to
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:06:22AM -0800, Victor Stinner wrote:
> 2013/1/4 Trent Nelson :
> > The installation of Ubuntu on the Pandaboard went smoothly.
> > However, it crashes after about an hour. Console output:
> >
> > http://trent.snakebite.net/pandaboard-crash.txt
> >
> >
Le Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:35:58 -0500,
Trent Nelson a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:06:22AM -0800, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > 2013/1/4 Trent Nelson :
> > > The installation of Ubuntu on the Pandaboard went smoothly.
> > > However, it crashes after about an hour. Console output:
> > >
>
Greetings,
I submitted a simple patch for updates to IDLE's documentation
http://bugs.python.org/issue5066 and it has not been reviewed by an official
Python developer. Since it is now been over 1month since last update can
somebody please review and or commit? I did get some comments fro
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:04:14 -0500, Todd V Rovito wrote:
> I submitted a simple patch for updates to IDLE's documentation
> http://bugs.python.org/issue5066 and it has not been reviewed by
> an official Python developer. Since it is now been over 1month
> since last update can
On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:23 AM, "R. David Murray" wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:04:14 -0500, Todd V Rovito wrote:
>> I submitted a simple patch for updates to IDLE's documentation
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue5066 and it has not been reviewed by
>> an official Python developer. Sin
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:40:10 -0500, Todd V Rovito wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:23 AM, "R. David Murray" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:04:14 -0500, Todd V Rovito
> > wrote:
> >> I submitted a simple patch for updates to IDLE's documentation
> >> http://bugs.python.org/issue5066
On 04.01.13 18:51, R. David Murray wrote:
(To automate such monitoring we would need some sort of 'commit ready'
flag in the tracker and a protocol for when it gets set...which might
not be a bad idea, but would need to be discussed)
Is not "commit review" stage purposed for this?
___
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-12-28 - 2013-01-04)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open3817 (-17)
closed 24823 (+78)
total 28640 (+61)
Open issues wit
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:56:22 +0200, Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> On 04.01.13 18:51, R. David Murray wrote:
> > (To automate such monitoring we would need some sort of 'commit ready'
> > flag in the tracker and a protocol for when it gets set...which might
> > not be a bad idea, but would need to be
2012/12/27 Sven Brauch :
> 2012/12/27 Guido van Rossum :
>> So just submit a patch to the tracker...
>>
>> --Guido
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, December 27, 2012, Sven Brauch wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/12/27 Nick Coghlan :
>>> > It certainly sounds like its worth considering for 3.4. It's a new
>>> > feature, th
On Jan 4, 2013, at 11:51 AM, "R. David Murray" wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:40:10 -0500, Todd V Rovito wrote:
>> On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:23 AM, "R. David Murray" wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:04:14 -0500, Todd V Rovito
>>> wrote:
I submitted a simple patch for updates to ID
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Dustin Mitchell wrote:
> As the maintainer of a pretty large, complex app written in Twisted, I think
> this is great. I look forward to a future of being able to select from a
> broad library of async tools, and being able to write tools that can be used
> outside
As the maintainer of a pretty large, complex app written in Twisted, I
think this is great. I look forward to a future of being able to select
from a broad library of async tools, and being able to write tools that can
be used outside of Twisted.
Buildbot began, lo these many years ago, doing
Dear python team,I never used python before and installed it today the first time, so I have no idea what to do about this failure:$ ./python -m test -v test_urlwithfrag== CPython 3.3.0 (default, Jan 4 2013, 23:08:00) [GCC 4.6.3]== Linux-3.2.0-35-generic-pae-i686-with-debian-wheezy-sid little-end
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:22:27 +0200
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> Thanks raymond for writing down a pure python version ;-)
>
> I did an initial port to RPython for experiments. The results (on
> large dicts only) are inconclusive - it's either a bit faster or a bit
> slower, dep
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Glyph wrote:
> In my humble (but entirely, verifiably correct) opinion, thinking of this as
> a "default" is propagating a design error in the BSD sockets API. Datagram
> and stream sockets have radically different semantics. In Twisted,
> "dataReceived" and "dat
On 1/4/2013 5:59 PM, Elli Lola wrote:
Dear python team,
I never used python before and installed it today the first time, so I
have no idea what to do about this failure:
This current-version usage question should have been directed to
python-list. pydev is only for discussion of future versi
Yes, this is question is for python-li...@python.org
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Elli Lola wrote:
> $ ./python -m test -v test_urlwithfrag
Where did you get this command from? It looks to me to me that more than
one person is trying the exact same command experiencing the same failure
(exp
On Jan 4, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Glyph wrote:
>> In my humble (but entirely, verifiably correct) opinion, thinking of this as
>> a "default" is propagating a design error in the BSD sockets API. Datagram
>> and stream sockets have radically
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Glyph wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Glyph wrote:
>>> In my humble (but entirely, verifiably correct) opinion, thinking of this as
>>> a "default" is propagating a design error in the BSD socket
On Jan 4, 2013, at 8:51 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Glyph wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Glyph wrote:
In my humble (but entirely, verifiably correct) opinion, thinking of this
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
