On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2013/3/26 Rocky Bernstein :
> > [asked on comp.lang.python but no takers. So I'm bumping it up a notch.]
> >
> > I have ported my Python debugger pydbgr to Python3. See [1] or [2].
> >
> > Inside the debugger, when there is an exec() som
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:59:06 -0700, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Sean Felipe Wolfe
> wrote:
> > Hey everybody how are you all :)
> >
> > I am an intermediate-level python coder looking to get help out. I've
> > been reading over the dev guide about helping increas
2013/3/26 Rocky Bernstein :
> [asked on comp.lang.python but no takers. So I'm bumping it up a notch.]
>
> I have ported my Python debugger pydbgr to Python3. See [1] or [2].
>
> Inside the debugger, when there is an exec() somewhere in the call stack,
> I'd like to be able to retrieve the string p
[asked on comp.lang.python but no takers. So I'm bumping it up a notch.]
I have ported my Python debugger pydbgr to Python3. See [1] or [2].
Inside the debugger, when there is an exec() somewhere in the call stack,
I'd like to be able to retrieve the string parameter. With this, the
debugger can
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Sean Felipe Wolfe wrote:
> Hey everybody how are you all :)
>
> I am an intermediate-level python coder looking to get help out. I've
> been reading over the dev guide about helping increase test coverage
> -->
> http://docs.python.org/devguide/coverage.html
>
> An
Hey everybody how are you all :)
I am an intermediate-level python coder looking to get help out. I've
been reading over the dev guide about helping increase test coverage
-->
http://docs.python.org/devguide/coverage.html
And also the third-party code coverage referenced in the devguide page:
htt
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
> Speakerdeck is slides only. The video is here:
> http://pyvideo.org/video/1730/python-33-trust-me-its-better-than-27
Sweet thanks!
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.p
Am 26.03.2013 um 23:05 schrieb Sean Felipe Wolfe :
>> Anyway, you should trust Brett Canon: "Python 3.3: Trust Me, It's
>> Better Than Python 2.7".
>>
>> https://speakerdeck.com/pyconslides/python-3-dot-3-trust-me-its-better-than-python-2-dot-7-by-dr-brett-cannon
> Was there supposed to be audio
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Anyway, you should trust Brett Canon: "Python 3.3: Trust Me, It's
> Better Than Python 2.7".
>
> https://speakerdeck.com/pyconslides/python-3-dot-3-trust-me-its-better-than-python-2-dot-7-by-dr-brett-cannon
Was there supposed to be audio wi
Hi,
I made progress since last August on my astoptimizer project (read the
Changelog). Previous email thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-August/121286.html
The astoptimizer project is an optimizer rewriting Python AST. It
executes as much code as possible during the compilat
Am 26.03.2013 13:13, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
> 2013/3/26 Matthias Klose :
>> Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
>>> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7 series.
>>
>> I hope it's not (and in the IDLE thread you say so otherwise too).
>
> "latest" is differ
Just an FYI that there are under 3 days to apply to Google Summer of
Code for mentoring organizations:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013. The
student application deadline is later on in May.
If you run a project that is interested in applying under the Python
umbrella org
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:54:11 +0100
a.cava...@cavallinux.eu wrote:
> It's already hard to sell 2.7 in most companies.
Sure, it's often hard to sell free software!
Regards
Antoine.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.or
Am 26.03.2013 19:41, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:53:39 +0100 (CET)
> christian.heimes wrote:
>> +
>> +The XML processing modules are not secure against maliciously constructed
>> data.
>> +An attacker can abuse vulnerabilities for e.g. denial of service attacks, to
>> +access
On Mar 26, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:53:39 +0100 (CET)
> christian.heimes wrote:
>> +
>> +The XML processing modules are not secure against maliciously constructed
>> data.
>> +An attacker can abuse vulnerabilities for e.g. denial of service attacks, to
>
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:53:39 +0100 (CET)
christian.heimes wrote:
> +
> +The XML processing modules are not secure against maliciously constructed
> data.
> +An attacker can abuse vulnerabilities for e.g. denial of service attacks, to
> +access local files, to generate network connections to other
And I still think it's neat. :-)
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 02:16 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just realized that the Python peephole optimizer removes useless
>> instructions like numbers and strings between other instructions,
>> without
On 03/25/2013 02:16 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I just realized that the Python peephole optimizer removes useless
instructions like numbers and strings between other instructions,
without raising an error nor emiting an error. Example:
$ python -Wd -c 'print "Hello"; "World"'
Hello
As part
Le Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:28:51 -0400,
"R. David Murray" a écrit :
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:16:47 -0700, Raymond Hettinger
> wrote:
> > If you're editing with Emacs, it is really easy to reflow paragraphs
> > and to insert or remove multiline comments each prefixed with #.
> > But with other editors
Le Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:34:34 +0100,
Victor Stinner a écrit :
> 2013/3/26 Lennart Regebro :
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Klose
> > wrote:
> >> Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
> >>> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7
> >>> series.
> >>
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:16:47 -0700, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> If you're editing with Emacs, it is really easy to reflow paragraphs
> and to insert or remove multiline comments each prefixed with #.
> But with other editors, it can be a PITA and a multiline string is
> the easiest to maintain and
2013/3/26 Matthias Klose :
> Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
>> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7 series.
>
> I hope it's not (and in the IDLE thread you say so otherwise too).
"latest" is different from "last" :)
--
Regards,
Benjamin
___
It's already hard to sell 2.7 in most companies.
Regards,
Antonio
Anyway, you should trust Brett Canon: "Python 3.3: Trust Me, It's
Better Than Python 2.7".
https://speakerdeck.com/pyconslides/python-3-dot-3-trust-me-its-better-than-python-2-dot-7-by-dr-brett-cannon
Victor
2013/3/26 Lennart Regebro :
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
>>> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7 series.
>>
>> I hope it's not (and in the IDLE thread you say so otherwise too).
>
> It most c
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
>> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7 series.
>
> I hope it's not (and in the IDLE thread you say so otherwise too).
It most certainly will be the latest once it's
Am 25.03.2013 01:30, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
> 2.7.4 will be the latest maintenance release in the Python 2.7 series.
I hope it's not (and in the IDLE thread you say so otherwise too).
Matthias
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
ht
26 matches
Mail list logo
