- Original Message -
Am 24.07.13 11:12, schrieb Bohuslav Kabrda:
- Should we point /usr/bin/python to Python 3 when we make the move?
This should depend on the answer to this question:
- for how long have you been providing /usr/bin/python2 binaries?
Huh, I don't know exactly,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Laurent Gautier lgaut...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/24/2013 06:30 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Laurent Gautier lgaut...@gmail.com
wrote:
- errors that are typical of Python 2 script running with Python
3-specific are probably
On Jul 24, 2013 6:37 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
The key, though, is adding python2 and getting your code to use that
binary specifically so that shifting the default name is more of a
convenience than something which might break existing code not ready for
the switch.
Applicable
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Laurent Gautier lgaut...@gmail.com wrote:
- a user is running a python script (he expects to be working), and is using
the default /usr/bin/python (formerly Python 2, now Python 3). If the
program fails because of obvious Python 2-only idioms, reporting this
On 25 July 2013 20:38, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2013 6:37 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
The key, though, is adding python2 and getting your code to use that
binary specifically so that shifting the default name is more of a
convenience than something
On 25 July 2013 10:06, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 Jul 2013 05:30, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:42:09PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Jul 25, 2013, at 01:41 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
How's this for an updated wording in the abstract:
Hi all,
I've been looking for a Github mirror for Python, and found two:
* https://github.com/python-git/python has a lot of forks/watches/starts
but seems to be very out of date (last updated 4 years ago)
* https://github.com/python-mirror/python doesn't appear to be very popular
but is updated
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been looking for a Github mirror for Python, and found two:
* https://github.com/python-git/python has a lot of forks/watches/starts but
seems to be very out of date (last updated 4 years ago)
*
Am 25.07.2013 16:29, schrieb Eli Bendersky:
Hi all,
I've been looking for a Github mirror for Python, and found two:
* https://github.com/python-git/python has a lot of forks/watches/starts
but seems to be very out of date (last updated 4 years ago)
*
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Christian Heimes christ...@python.org wrote:
Am 25.07.2013 16:29, schrieb Eli Bendersky:
Hi all,
I've been looking for a Github mirror for Python, and found two:
* https://github.com/python-git/python has a lot of forks/watches/starts
but seems to be very
Am 25.07.2013 16:48, schrieb Brian Curtin:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Christian Heimes christ...@python.org
wrote:
Am 25.07.2013 16:29, schrieb Eli Bendersky:
Hi all,
I've been looking for a Github mirror for Python, and found two:
* https://github.com/python-git/python has a lot of
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Christian Heimes christ...@python.org
wrote:
Am 25.07.2013 16:29, schrieb Eli Bendersky:
Hi all,
I've been looking for a Github mirror for Python, and found two:
*
Le Thu, 25 Jul 2013 12:08:18 +1000,
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au a écrit :
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
To reduce the need for 3rd party subprocess creation code, we should
have better daemon creation code in the stdlib -- I wrote some damn
robust code for this
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Christian Heimes christ...@python.org
wrote:
Am 25.07.2013 16:29, schrieb Eli Bendersky:
Hi all,
I've been
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Laurent Gautier lgaut...@gmail.com wrote:
My meaning was the use of 2to3's machinery (and fire a message if a
translation occurs) not 2to3 itself, obviously.
I don't understand what you mean is the difference.
//Lennart
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:25:26PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 25 July 2013 20:38, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2013 6:37 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
The key, though, is adding python2 and getting your code to use that
binary specifically so that
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Christian Heimes christ...@python.org
Hello,
this is an update on my work and the current status of Coverity Scan.
Maybe you have noticed a checkins made be me that end with the line CID
#. These are checkins that fix an issue that was discovered by the
static code analyzer Coverity. Coverity is a commercial product but it's
a free
On 07/25/2013 06:03 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Laurent Gautier lgaut...@gmail.com wrote:
My meaning was the use of 2to3's machinery (and fire a message if a
translation occurs) not 2to3 itself, obviously.
I don't understand what you mean is the difference.
On 7/25/2013 2:48 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Hello,
this is an update on my work and the current status of Coverity Scan.
Great work.
Maybe you have noticed a checkins made be me that end with the line CID
#. These are checkins that fix an issue that was discovered by the
static code
On 7/25/2013 6:00 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Defect Density:0.05
= defects per thousand lines = 20/400
Anything under 1 is good. The release above reports Samba now at .6.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2038244/linux-code-is-the-benchmark-of-quality-study-concludes.html
reports Linux 3.8 as
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:00:55 -0400
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/25/2013 2:48 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Hello,
this is an update on my work and the current status of Coverity Scan.
Great work.
Maybe you have noticed a checkins made be me that end with the line CID
#.
Am 26.07.2013 00:32, schrieb Terry Reedy:
I found the answer here
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5wQCOK_TiRiMWVqQ0xPaDEzbkU/edit
Coverity Integrity Level 1 is 1 (defect/1000 lines)
Level 2 is .1 (we have passed that)
Level 3 is .01 + no major defects + 20% (all all defects?) false
Am 26.07.2013 00:50, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
Excellence? The term is too weak, I would say perfection at least,
but perhaps we should go as far as divinity.
Don't forget that Python can offer lots of places to keep your bike
clean and dry ... *scnr*
Am 26.07.2013 00:00, schrieb Terry Reedy:
http://www.coverity.com/company/press-releases/read/coverity-introduces-monthly-spotlight-series-for-coverity-scan-open-source-projects
The intention is to promote the best of open source to industry.
I think it's also a marketing tool. They like to
On 7/25/2013 6:56 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Am 26.07.2013 00:32, schrieb Terry Reedy:
# Since false positives should stay constant as true positives are
reduced toward 0, false / all should tend toward 1 (100%) if I
understand the ratio correctly.
Which I did not ;-).
About 40% of the
On 26 Jul 2013 03:02, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On 25Jul2013 17:26, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
| Le Thu, 25 Jul 2013 12:08:18 +1000,
| Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au a écrit :
| Work continues on the PEP 3143-compatible ‘python-daemon’, porting it
| to Python 3 and aiming for inclusion in the standard library.
|
| The
28 matches
Mail list logo
