Stephen J. Turnbull writes:
> .deploy.static.akamitechnologies.com (according to host ),
Ignore this; *my* aging eyes dropped the "A" in "akamAitechnologies.com".
Sorry for the noise.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.py
The first build my new root buildbot did showed errors in the 2.7 test
suite, but I thought little of it as quite a few other 2.7 buildbots
are showing red, too. But it seems they're showing different errors,
so there might be something wrong with the setup.
http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 23:54:41 -0600, Tim Peters wrote:
[Bob Hanson]
> >> ... magnifying glass, I see it is two very long URLs ending with
> >> something like after the blah-blah: < ... akametechnology.com>
[Stephen J. Turnbull]
> > I suppose you tried cutting and pasting? [...]
Tried, but was uns
On 06.01.2014 05:12, Donald Stufft wrote:
ensurepip uses —no-index so it shouldn’t be hitting the network at all.
Do you have a test to ensure that ensurepip doesn't try to use network
connections? You could e.g. mock socket.create_connection() and
socket.socket() in a custom socket module. T
[Bob Hanson]
>> ... magnifying glass, I see it is two very long URLs ending with
>> something like after the blah-blah: < ... akametechnology.com>
[Stephen J. Turnbull]
> I suppose you tried cutting and pasting? Note that you don't need to
> be exact as long as you're pretty sure you got the whol
Bob Hanson writes:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 20:09:23 -0600, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> > As Benjamin asked, could you please flesh out what
> > "blah-blah-blah-dot-com" means - what, exactly, was the site your
> > firewall warned you about?
>
> Forgive me, but I'm an old man with very poor vision.
ensurepip uses —no-index so it shouldn’t be hitting the network at all.
On Jan 5, 2014, at 11:06 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:32:15 -0800, Bob Hanson wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 21:09:53 -0600, Tim Peters wrote:
>>> So it's just Akamai caching content. Common as mud. C
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:32:15 -0800, Bob Hanson wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 21:09:53 -0600, Tim Peters wrote:
> > So it's just Akamai caching content. Common as mud. Can't say
> > specifically what was being cached, but it _could_ be that your ISP
> > contracts with Akamai.
>
> Still not followi
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 21:09:53 -0600, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Bob Hanson]
> > Forgive me, but I'm an old man with very poor vision. Using my
> > magnifying glass, I see it is two very long URLs ending with
> > something like after the blah-blah: < ... akametechnology.com>
> >
> > More precisely, these t
[Bob Hanson]
> Forgive me, but I'm an old man with very poor vision. Using my
> magnifying glass, I see it is two very long URLs ending with
> something like after the blah-blah: < ... akametechnology.com>
>
> More precisely, these two IP addresses:
> 23.59.190.113:80
> 23.59.190.106:80
So
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 20:09:23 -0600, Tim Peters wrote:
> As Benjamin asked, could you please flesh out what
> "blah-blah-blah-dot-com" means - what, exactly, was the site your
> firewall warned you about?
Forgive me, but I'm an old man with very poor vision. Using my
magnifying glass, I see it is
On 01/05/2014 06:02 PM, Bob Hanson wrote:
I'm presuming, still, that it is something to do with the "ensure
that pip is present on Windows" thing?
Perhaps you could help us out by telling us what site was trying to be accessed?
--
~Ethan~
___
Python
[Bob Hanson]
> ...
> Didn't think this likely, but I have now quintuple-checked
> everything again. Everything says I have the real McCoy
> msiexec.exe in its proper location -- just upgraded another app
> which used MSI installers and it went as per normal.
That sounds most likely to me too ;-)
[Bob Hanson]
> > This is the first time I ever installed a version of Python which
> > caused something called "MSIEXEC.EXE"
[Tim Peters]
> msiexec.exe is not part of the Python download.. msiexec.exe is part
> of the Windows operating system, and is precisely the program that
> installs .msi fil
[Benjamin Peterson]
> ...
> This is the first time I ever installed a version of Python which
> caused something called "MSIEXEC.EXE"
msiexec.exe is not part of the Python download.. msiexec.exe is part
of the Windows operating system, and is precisely the program that
installs .msi files (which
I'm sure that the main problem is that people don't search.
Surprisingly, it's often easier to complain "there is no X" than to
try to search for a solution to X.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Antoine Pitrou
> Date: Sun
--
Regards,
Benjamin
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014, at 04:19 PM, Bob Hanson wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:20:50 -0800, Larry Hastings wrote:
>
> > On behalf of the Python development team, I'm pleased to announce
> > the second beta release of Python 3.4.
>
> Thanks, Larry and all the devs, your hard
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:20:50 -0800, Larry Hastings wrote:
> On behalf of the Python development team, I'm pleased to announce
> the second beta release of Python 3.4.
Thanks, Larry and all the devs, your hard work is appreciated.
However, why does this new version look like adware or other
malwa
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > I had that working at one point. Guido said no, keep it all in one file.
> > I'm flexible but first you'd have to convince him.
>
> It's also not something we're stuck with forever - we can start with it inline
> (which has the advantage of keeping all the code in the sa
On 6 Jan 2014 05:54, "Larry Hastings" wrote:
>
> On 01/05/2014 01:49 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>>
>> But I very much upset by the fact that the generated code is written
mixed with written manually. It is difficult to navigate (list of symbols
now contains three times more names), makes it diffi
On 01/05/2014 01:49 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
But I very much upset by the fact that the generated code is written
mixed with written manually. It is difficult to navigate (list of
symbols now contains three times more names), makes it difficult to
read and provokes error (editing the generat
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm pleased to announce
the second beta release of Python 3.4.
This is a preview release, and its use is not recommended for
production settings.
Python 3.4 includes a range of improvements of the 3.x series, including
hundreds of small improvements and
It looks interesting enough. I volunteer to convert at least the
audioop, grp, operator, pwd, spw, sre, struct, tkinter modules (audioop
already converted, tkinter in progress). If no one will get them, I
perhaps will convert the builtins, sys, itertools, functools modules and
str, bytes, byte
On 01/05/2014 11:49 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/5/2014 11:21 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
By my estimate, there are about six hundred places that could be
converted
to work with Argument Clinic in CPython; as of this writing only a
dozen or
two have actually been converted.
Do you remember which?
Hi,
I've released libmpdec-2.4.0, which can be used to compile _decimal with the
"--with-system-libmpdec" configure option:
http://www.bytereef.org/mpdecimal/download.html
libmpdec-2.4.0 is exactly the same as the one in the CPython source tree. The
API is stable and the libmpdec-2.x.y series
On 1/5/2014 11:21 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
Let me start with a summary of the current status of Argument Clinic.
It's checked in, it seems to be working fine. As of Friday I've checked
in some reasonably complete documentation as a howto:
http://docs.python.org/3.4/howto/clinic.html
At
-- Forwarded message --
From: Antoine Pitrou
Date: Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] 2.x vs 3.x survey results
To: python-dev@python.org
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 11:23:45 -0600
Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > On Sun
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 11:23:45 -0600
Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:20 AM, John Yeuk Hon Wong
> > wrote:
> >> I think it helps Luca and many others (including myself) if there is a
> >> reference of the difference between 2.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:20 AM, John Yeuk Hon Wong
> wrote:
>> I think it helps Luca and many others (including myself) if there is a
>> reference of the difference between 2.7 and Python 3.3+.
>
> Not specifically for 2.7 and 3.3, no. This
On 01/04/2014 08:20 PM, John Yeuk Hon Wong wrote:
I think it helps Luca and many others (including myself) if there is a
reference of the difference between 2.7 and
Python 3.3+.
Here's another reference:
http://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/imprint_downloads/informit/promotions/python/python2pytho
Let me start with a summary of the current status of Argument Clinic.
It's checked in, it seems to be working fine. As of Friday I've checked
in some reasonably complete documentation as a howto:
http://docs.python.org/3.4/howto/clinic.html
At last, here in beta 2, Argument Clinic is r
Lennart Regebro writes:
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:20 AM, John Yeuk Hon Wong
> wrote:
> > If there is such reference available?
>
> I'm honestly despairing that people still don't know that there is a
> free book on the topic. I have no idea how to increase the knowledge
> on this point.
John Y
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:20 AM, John Yeuk Hon Wong
wrote:
> I think it helps Luca and many others (including myself) if there is a
> reference of the difference between 2.7 and Python 3.3+.
Not specifically for 2.7 and 3.3, no. This is a fairly complete list:
http://python3porting.com/difference
33 matches
Mail list logo
