On 27/04/15 00:13, Guido van Rossum wrote:
But new syntax is the whole point of the PEP. I want to be able to
*syntactically* tell where the suspension points are in coroutines.
Doesn't yield from already do that?
Currently this means looking for yield [from]; PEP 492 just adds looking
for
On 26/04/15 23:24, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 27 Apr 2015 07:50, Mark Shannon m...@hotpy.org
mailto:m...@hotpy.org wrote:
On 26/04/15 21:40, Yury Selivanov wrote:
But it's hard. Iterating through something asynchronously? Write a
'while True' loop. Instead of 1 line you now have 5 or
Yury Selivanov wrote:
I've done some experiments with grammar, and it looks like
we indeed can parse await quite differently from yield. Three
different options:
You don't seem to have tried what I suggested, which is
to make 'await' a unary operator with the same precedence
as '-', i.e.
Hi Greg,
I don't want this: await a() * b() to be parsed, it's not meaningful.
Likely you'll see await await a() only once in your life, so I'm fine
to use parens for it (moreover, I think it reads better with parens)
Yury
On 2015-04-27 8:52 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
Yury Selivanov wrote:
Hi python-dev,
Another round of updates. Reference implementation
has been updated: https://github.com/1st1/cpython/tree/await
(includes all things from the below summary of updates +
tests).
Summary:
1. PyTypeObject.tp_await slot. Replaces tp_reserved.
This is to enable implementation of
Yury Selivanov schrieb am 28.04.2015 um 05:07:
e) Should we add a coroutine ABC (for cython etc)?
Sounds like the right thing to do, yes. IIUC, a Coroutine would be a new
stand-alone ABC with send, throw and close methods.
Should a Generator then inherit from both Iterator and Coroutine, or
