[Python-Dev] Release schedule for Python 3.5.2

I've been holding off on the hope that one or two bugs would get fixes. But those seem to have stalled. So I think it's time that we pushed out a 3.5.2. Maybe announcing a schedule will light a fire under some rumps. I put "Spring 2016" as the release date for 3.5.2 on the 3.5 release

Re: [Python-Dev] Anyone want to lead the sprints at PyCon US 2016?

No one stepped forward to lead the sprints this year, so I will put myself as the sprint leader and lean on everyone else who appears to help. :) On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 at 09:36 Brett Cannon wrote: > The call has started to go out for sprint groups to list themselves > online.

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

On 04/28/2016 08:26 AM, Stefan Krah wrote: Random832 writes: A more relevant point would be that _decimal does *not* use the API in a way *which would be broken by the proposed change*, regardless of whether the way in which it uses it is subjectively correct or can cause leaks. And the

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

Stefan, could you explain which module you are talking about and why it would cost you a week? What is your responsibility here? --Guido (mobile) On Apr 28, 2016 8:28 AM, "Stefan Krah" wrote: > Random832 fastmail.com> writes: > > A more relevant point would be that

Re: [Python-Dev] Needs to install python 3.4.4 in RHEL 6

Hi Nilesh, On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Nilesh Date wrote: > Hi team, > > I wanted to install python version 3.4.4 in my RHEL 6 system. > Can someone give installation process or any reference link from which I can > get required steps and download desire package.

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

Random832 fastmail.com> writes: > A more relevant point would be that _decimal does *not* use the API in a > way *which would be broken by the proposed change*, regardless of > whether the way in which it uses it is subjectively correct or can cause > leaks. And the ultimate point is that I

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

Serhiy Storchaka gmail.com> writes: > 2. Most code that use PyModule_AddObject() doesn't work as intended. > Since the bahavior of PyModule_AddObject() contradicts the documentation > and is contrintuitive, we can't blame authors in this. > > I don't say this is a high-impacting bug, I even

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, at 10:11, Stefan Krah wrote: > For actual users of Valgrind this is patently obvious and was > pretty much the point of my post. A more relevant point would be that _decimal does *not* use the API in a way *which would be broken by the proposed change*, regardless of whether

[Python-Dev] Needs to install python 3.4.4 in RHEL 6

Hi team, I wanted to install python version 3.4.4 in my RHEL 6 system. Can someone give installation process or any reference link from which I can get required steps and download desire package. Thanks, *Nilesh Date* ___ Python-Dev mailing list

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

Random832 fastmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, at 05:05, Stefan Krah wrote: > > $ valgrind --suppressions=Misc/valgrind-python.supp ./python -c "import > > decimal" > > > > [...] > > ==16945== LEAK SUMMARY: > > ==16945==definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > >

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

On 28.04.16 11:38, Stefan Krah wrote: Serhiy Storchaka gmail.com> writes: No impact except emitting a deprecation warning at build time. But we can remove a deprecation warning and add it in future release if this is annoying. But are you sure, that your code uses PyModule_AddObject()

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, at 05:05, Stefan Krah wrote: > $ valgrind --suppressions=Misc/valgrind-python.supp ./python -c "import > decimal" > > [...] > ==16945== LEAK SUMMARY: > ==16945==definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > Well, the obvious

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

Serhiy Storchaka gmail.com> writes: > But are you sure, that your code uses PyModule_AddObject() correctly? > Only two modules in the stdlib (_json and _tkinter) used it correctly. > Other modules have bugs even in tries to use PyModule_AddObject() > correctly for some operations. For the

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

Serhiy Storchaka gmail.com> writes: > No impact except emitting a deprecation warning at build time. But we > can remove a deprecation warning and add it in future release if this is > annoying. > > But are you sure, that your code uses PyModule_AddObject() correctly? > Only two modules in

Re: [Python-Dev] Inconsistency of PyModule_AddObject()

On 28.04.16 01:24, Case Van Horsen wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: I think it is better to have relation with PyModule_AddIntConstant() etc than with PyObject_SetAttrString. My patch doesn't introduce new public function, but changes the