The only other thing that would make sense is a folder in the current
working directory named ".", not?
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:05 PM Larry Hastings wrote:
>
> On 6/3/21 4:20 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>
> Might be out of context here, but IMHO "." shouldn't be assumed to be the
> current
Hello,
I'm a bit surprised that this topic is brought up just days before the
feature freeze of Python 3.10. How did tools work until now with from
future import annotations? This feature has been in the language for years
(since 3.7), and I haven't heard until today anyone complaining about
Hello,
In general, I love the idea and implementation. I'm not in love with the
name though, it makes it sound like it contains all module names
imported/available. We have sys.module already containing all module
imported. So without a deeper knowledge sys.modules_names is very close to
This opens the door for people voting on A or B depending on if they would
accept or reject the PEP. Is this something we're willing to accept?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:29 PM Ethan Furman via Python-Dev <
python-dev@python.org> wrote:
> On 12/7/20 11:29 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > After much
